On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, John R. Jackson wrote:
Sorry it took so long to get back to you.
I was able to reproduce (and even fix :-) the problem. Give the
following patch a try.
Hi John.
This patch works great. Thanks for your time/efforts.
--david
Here's what I get when I run the patched 2.4.3 version:
# /amanda/sbin/amrestore /dev/rmt0.1 shrike /home
amrestore: could not stat /dev/rmt0.1: A memory address is not in the
address space for the process.
Sorry it took so long to get back to you.
I was able to reproduce (and even fix
amrestore: could not stat /dev/rmt0.1
That message comes from a pretty simple stat() system call on the tape
device. Was the drive ready when you did this? I assume /dev/rmt0.1
was the right device name?
In any case, could you apply the following patch and report what the
error code
[3] = /dev/rmt0.1
argv[4] = ^dihedral$
argv[5] = ^/home$
argv[6] = 20021218
amrestore: could not stat /dev/rmt0.1
amidextaped: time 0.185: amrestore terminated normally with status: 2
amidextaped: could not stat /dev/rmt0.1
amidextaped: time 0.185: could not stat /dev/rmt0.1
amidextaped: time 0.185
