amverify - reality check?

2007-05-07 Thread Donofrio, Lewis
Folks, I've been tasked with "guaranteeing" that the backup vtapes or in the future real tapes are "good." So I found the command amverify that seems to be the correct routine but I want to know does it completely check the archive and the files contained within? ___

Re: amverify - reality check?

2007-05-07 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 07 May 2007, Donofrio, Lewis wrote: >Folks, > >I've been tasked with "guaranteeing" that the backup vtapes or in the >future real tapes are "good." So I found the command amverify that >seems to be the correct routine but I want to know does it completely >check the archive and the files

Re: amverify - reality check?

2007-05-07 Thread Olivier Nicole
> I've been tasked with "guaranteeing" that the backup vtapes or in the > future real tapes are "good." So I found the command amverify that > seems to be the correct routine but I want to know does it completely > check the archive and the files contained within? Amverify will try to extract a

Re: amverify - reality check?

2007-05-07 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:42:52AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > I've been tasked with "guaranteeing" that the backup vtapes or in the > > future real tapes are "good." So I found the command amverify that > > seems to be the correct routine but I want to know does it completely > > check the a

RE: amverify - reality check?

2007-05-08 Thread Donofrio, Lewis
L PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-amanda- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon LaBadie > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 12:05 AM > To: amanda-users@amanda.org > Subject: Re: amverify - reality check? > > On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:42:52AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > I'

Re: amverify - reality check?

2007-05-08 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:26:27AM -0400, Donofrio, Lewis wrote: > Thanks one and all for your input, I am planning on using a holding > disk, vtapes for storage and archiving to ati2 tapes. I realize that > the amverify would be rough on tape drives, but if I use d2d I should be > fine. And I'm

Re: amverify - reality check?

2007-05-08 Thread Chris Hoogendyk
Jon LaBadie wrote: > The second part can only be done by actually doing restores. > Perhaps you could schedule periodic recoveries of files > or directory trees. Do some sort of varying selection of > clients, tapes, and data to recover. Maybe even a regular > "the chips are down" disaster exer

Re: amverify - reality check?

2007-05-08 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:10:15AM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: > > > Jon LaBadie wrote: > > The second part can only be done by actually doing restores. > > Perhaps you could schedule periodic recoveries of files > > or directory trees. Do some sort of varying selection of > > clients, tapes,

Re: amverify - reality check?

2007-05-08 Thread Chris Hoogendyk
Jon LaBadie wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:10:15AM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: > >> Jon LaBadie wrote: >> >>> The second part can only be done by actually doing restores. >>> Perhaps you could schedule periodic recoveries of files >>> or directory trees. Do some sort of varying se

Re: amverify - reality check?

2007-05-08 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi, In the line with what have been discussed, would it be possible that Amanda does some kind of CRC on the dump, on the client side, and that this CRC information is checked when running amverify? That would allow to say that not only a piece of backup can be read, uncompressed, untared (if GNU