On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 09:27 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:43:30AM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:32 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> > > On 2006-03-16 09:12, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> Should you decide to consolidate, I'd recommend you NOT
> do it all
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:43:30AM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:32 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> > On 2006-03-16 09:12, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# amadmin IS balance
> > >
> > > due-date #fsorig KB out KB balance
> > >
On Thursday 16 March 2006 04:32, Paul Bijnens wrote:
[...]
>The "reserve 30" will Amanda force in doing only 60% of free
> holdingdisk for level 0, and the rest for incrementals.
>
>Note that those 30% is calculated each run again, based on the current
>available space in the holdingdisk: if you st
On 2006-03-15 18:05, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
||
|| inparallel 1
Only now my eye fell on this one here.
This is not about balancing your level 0 dumps, but with
"inparallel 1", you are not using any possibility
to do things in parallel, a very useful feature in Amanda.
From my archive run in the
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 10:32 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> On 2006-03-16 09:12, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> >> And, actually, we did not yet see how many times this DLE
> >> was dumped with level 0.
> >>
> >> Can you post the output of "amadmin config balance" and
> >> "amoverview config" (or mail it to
On 2006-03-16 09:12, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
And, actually, we did not yet see how many times this DLE
was dumped with level 0.
Can you post the output of "amadmin config balance" and
"amoverview config" (or mail it to me if it contains
too much private information).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# a
Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# amadmin IS balance
>
> due-date #fsorig KB out KB balance
> --
> 3/16 Thu0 0 0 ---
> 3/17 Fri0 0 0 ---
> 3/18 Sat0 0
>
> And, actually, we did not yet see how many times this DLE
> was dumped with level 0.
>
> Can you post the output of "amadmin config balance" and
> "amoverview config" (or mail it to me if it contains
> too much private information).
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# amadmin IS balance
due-da
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 11:27, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
>> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:45 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
>> > > Here are the 2 parts of the config:
[...]
>I d
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:10:15PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 18:13 schrieb Paul Bijnens:
> > On 2006-03-15 17:27, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > > I don't think this is the problem, but I do not see a "record yes"
> > > setting. I wonder if that is needed to ensure amanda k
Thomas Widhalm schreef:
I ran a "amadmin disklist" right now and here is one example for the
disks I encountered many level 0 backups.
host springfield.edvz.sbg.ac.at:
interface default
disk /:
program "GNUTAR"
priority 1
dumpcycle 6
maxdumps 1
Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
> I ran a "amadmin disklist" right now and here is one example for the
> disks I encountered many level 0 backups.
>
> host springfield.edvz.sbg.ac.at:
> interface default
> disk /:
> program "GNUTAR"
> priority 1
> dumpcycle 6
>
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 18:13 schrieb Paul Bijnens:
> On 2006-03-15 17:27, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > I don't think this is the problem, but I do not see a "record yes"
> > setting. I wonder if that is needed to ensure amanda knows when
> > the last full dump was done? It is needed for "dump", but
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 06:05:05PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 17:27 schrieb Jon LaBadie:
>
> > I know you are not using tape now, but whenever you run
> > amcheck (you do don't right?) it will complain tapecycle
> > less than runspercycle.
>
> I do call amcheck from
Paul Bijnens schrieb:
> On 2006-03-15 17:27, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>>
>> I don't think this is the problem, but I do not see a "record yes"
>> setting. I wonder if that is needed to ensure amanda knows when
>> the last full dump was done? It is needed for "dump", but I'm
>> uncertain about gnutar.
>
On 2006-03-15 17:27, Jon LaBadie wrote:
I don't think this is the problem, but I do not see a "record yes"
setting. I wonder if that is needed to ensure amanda knows when
the last full dump was done? It is needed for "dump", but I'm
uncertain about gnutar.
I think you hit the nail right on t
Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 17:27 schrieb Jon LaBadie:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:45 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> > > > Here are the 2 parts of the config:
> > >
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:45 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> > >
> > > Here are the 2 parts of the config:
> > >
> >
> > I took the liberty of deleting the comments an
Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
> I removed all tapes from the config. I just save to the holding disk. I
> can live with the daily "tape error", but I want amanda to do less full
> backups.
>
>> ||
>> || holdingdisk hd1 {
>> || comment "main holding disk for IS"
>> || directory "/data/amanda/I
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 07:03, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
>On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
>> >> Have you tried resetting some parameters like bumpsize, bumpmult,
>> >> and bumpdays? They
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 04:48, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
>On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
>> >> Have you tried resetting some parameters like bumpsize, bumpmult,
>> >> and bumpdays? They
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:45 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > >
> > > If that didn't solve your issues you maybe share your config with us.
> > > This would help to get
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> >
> > If that didn't solve your issues you maybe share your config with us.
> > This would help to get the picture.
>
> Here are the 2 parts of the config:
>
I took
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
>
> >> Have you tried resetting some parameters like bumpsize, bumpmult,
> >> and bumpdays? They may have an affect on your situation.
> >>
> > This could
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:49 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
>
> >> Have you tried resetting some parameters like bumpsize, bumpmult,
> >> and bumpdays? They may have an affect on your situation.
> >>
> > This could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Widhalm schrieb:
>> Have you tried resetting some parameters like bumpsize, bumpmult,
>> and bumpdays? They may have an affect on your situation.
>>
> This could really be it. bumpsize was set 100Mb. Maybe, because this
> setup was used to bac
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:03, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 08:54, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
>> >> > dumpcycle 8 days. amanda run from a script within crontab every
>> >> > day.
>> >>
>> >> There was an "etc." up there.
>
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 08:54, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> >> >
> >> > dumpcycle 8 days. amanda run from a script within crontab every
> >> > day.
> >>
> >> There was an "etc." up there.
> >> Presumably your runspercycle is also 8?
> >
>
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 08:54, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
>On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:59 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:05:00PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 15:57 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
>> > > On 2006-03-13 15:45, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
>> > > > Hi!
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:59 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:05:00PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 15:57 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> > > On 2006-03-13 15:45, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> Have you tried resetting some parameters like bumpsize, bumpmult,
>
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:59 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:05:00PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 15:57 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> > > On 2006-03-13 15:45, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > We have a rather old workstation running t
Leonid Shulov schreef:
Hi, NG!
I do night backup from all servers and PC's and 3 daily backups to
holding disk, and after that amflush (All this backups is incrementals)
All backup files is with level 0.
Once weekly I do full backup.
That happened after upgrading to new version.
Is this a ne
Hi, NG!
I do night backup from all servers and PC's and 3 daily backups to
holding disk, and after that amflush (All this backups is incrementals)
All backup files is with level 0.
Once weekly I do full backup.
That happened after upgrading to new version.
Thanks,
Leonid
Thomas Widhalm wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:05:00PM +0100, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 15:57 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> > On 2006-03-13 15:45, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > We have a rather old workstation running tao 1 (is RHEL 3) with amanda
> > > amanda-2.4.4p1-0.3E.1 . Since t
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 15:57 +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> On 2006-03-13 15:45, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > We have a rather old workstation running tao 1 (is RHEL 3) with amanda
> > amanda-2.4.4p1-0.3E.1 . Since this is too old for vdisks, we just backup
> > to the holding disk. But it ma
On 2006-03-13 15:45, Thomas Widhalm wrote:
Hi!
We have a rather old workstation running tao 1 (is RHEL 3) with amanda
amanda-2.4.4p1-0.3E.1 . Since this is too old for vdisks, we just backup
to the holding disk. But it makes lots of level 0 backups. Some
filesystems have level 0 just every day!
Hi!
We have a rather old workstation running tao 1 (is RHEL 3) with amanda
amanda-2.4.4p1-0.3E.1 . Since this is too old for vdisks, we just backup
to the holding disk. But it makes lots of level 0 backups. Some
filesystems have level 0 just every day!
Is there a way to make level incemental back
37 matches
Mail list logo
