* Joshua Baker-LePain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030117 16:54] thus spake:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 at 4:17pm, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote
>
> > So after going through some index files and cleaning them and
> > verifying that amrecover can deal with them I wonder what else might
> > have gone wrong usin
On Friday 17 January 2003 16:17, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
>Hello,
>[...]
>Does someone knows which sub-version of gnutar 1.13 are affected
> with this bug?
Its generally agreed that 1.13-19 and 1.13-25 do _not_ suffer from
this bug. The newest, 1.13-25 version you have to get from
alpha.gnu
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 at 4:17pm, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote
> So after going through some index files and cleaning them and
> verifying that amrecover can deal with them I wonder what else might
> have gone wrong using this gnutar version.
ISTR that the backups themselves are actually fine.
> Doe
Hello,
I just realized yesterday that one of my amanda client is using a
buggy version of gnutar (SGI Freeware version 1.13) and that the index
files have garbage at the beginning of each line:
07607207551/./amanda/etc/
^
|
crap!
preventing me from using amrec