Cameron Matheson wrote:
many systems should be able to fit on one tape
(i'm using hw compression on tapes that hold a little
over 100GB w/ no compression). Anyway, the problem
now is that i need to back up a system that is
120GB i can split that up no problem (i'm just
using tar anyway), bu
--On Thursday, June 02, 2005 15:10:51 -0700 Cameron Matheson <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> --- Frank Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Unless you need something special for the new
>> machine (such as a different schedule or odd
>> requirements for data retention) it's easiest to
>> ju
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 02:12:45PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my amanda configuration is very simple, but running
> smooth. as i continue to add more clients, i'm
> starting to wonder what the best way to go about
> things are... so far my 'runtapes' parameter is set to
> 1. many s
--On Thursday, June 02, 2005 14:12:45 -0700 Cameron Matheson <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my amanda configuration is very simple, but running
> smooth. as i continue to add more clients, i'm
> starting to wonder what the best way to go about
> things are... so far my 'runtapes' paramete
Hi,
my amanda configuration is very simple, but running
smooth. as i continue to add more clients, i'm
starting to wonder what the best way to go about
things are... so far my 'runtapes' parameter is set to
1. many systems should be able to fit on one tape
(i'm using hw compression on tapes that
