directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1

2008-07-26 Thread Doyle Collings
I have decided to clean out my old installations of Amanda 2.46, 2.6.0p1 rpm, and 2.6.0p1 from source and start fresh. I noticed that the defaults of the install from source do not match the rpm from zmanda. For example, The link http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Amanda_packages_from_Zmanda_dow

Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1

2008-07-26 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 26 July 2008, Doyle Collings wrote: >I have decided to clean out my old installations of Amanda 2.46, 2.6.0p1 > rpm, and 2.6.0p1 from source and start fresh. I noticed that the defaults > of the install from source do not match the rpm from zmanda. For example, > The link > http://wik

Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1

2008-07-26 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 2:43 AM, Doyle Collings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have decided to clean out my old installations of Amanda 2.46, 2.6.0p1 rpm, > and 2.6.0p1 from source and start fresh. I noticed that the defaults of the > install from source do not match the rpm from zmanda. For ex

Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1

2008-07-26 Thread Doyle Collings
When you say thay your getting rid of --with-maxtapeblocksize in Amanda-2.6.1, does that mean I will be able to specify blocksize in my tapetype definition without it? Is is neccesary now or does it just specify the maximum blocksize I can use? Is there a source RPM for 64bit SLES? >>> "Dusti

Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1

2008-07-26 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Doyle Collings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When you say thay your getting rid of --with-maxtapeblocksize in > Amanda-2.6.1, does that mean I will be able to specify blocksize in my > tapetype definition without it? Is is neccesary now or does it just specify >

Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1

2008-07-26 Thread Doyle Collings
If I do not specify --with-maxtapeblocksize when the source is configured in 2.6.0p1 will the blocksize parameter in tapetype be ignored and the block size default to 32k?

Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1

2008-07-26 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 03:56:38PM -0600, Doyle Collings wrote: > If I do not specify --with-maxtapeblocksize when the source is configured in > 2.6.0p1 will the blocksize parameter in tapetype be ignored and the block > size default to 32k? > I don't have definitive information on this, but I

Re: directory locations and dumpuser after new install of amanda 2.6.0p1

2008-07-28 Thread Doyle Collings
I recieved the following warnings after adding --with-maxtapeblocksize to my amanda.spec file and issuing the rpmbuild -ba amanda.spec command: WARNINGS: no user specified (--with-user) -- using 'amanda' no group specified (--with-group) -- using 'backup' + --with-index-server=localhost --with-