Sorry - I didn't mean to contradict Jon LaBadie or cause confusion.
There are two messages which always seem similar to me and I'd believed
that I was talking about the correct one.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 02:00:05PM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>
> Dump larger than tape is "the sum of the dumps
--On Friday, December 17, 2004 13:35:17 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am running Amanda on a network that I administer. I don't have a lot
> of Amanda experience, having always used afio scripts that I wrote. I
> inherited this backup config and am trying to get up to speed on it. I
> see sev
Dump larger than tape is "the sum of the dumps is projected to be
larger than the tape capacity" therefore something will be skipped.
It will eventually get to tape but you might want to tell us a little
bit more, number/capacity of the partitions in the disklist, tape
capacity, runs/cycle, dumpc
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:35:17PM -0500, Vicki Stanfield wrote:
> I am running Amanda on a network that I administer. I don't have a lot
> of Amanda experience, having always used afio scripts that I wrote. I
> inherited this backup config and am trying to get up to speed on it. I
> see several of
I am running Amanda on a network that I administer. I don't have a lot
of Amanda experience, having always used afio scripts that I wrote. I
inherited this backup config and am trying to get up to speed on it. I
see several of these messages stating that the dump is being delayed.
Obviously I want
