Re: groups when using tar

2000-10-24 Thread Peter Schaffrath
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, John R. Jackson wrote: > You have a group with write access to the raw device??? Ick. Err, this meant read access :-) Peter

Re: groups when using tar

2000-10-24 Thread John R. Jackson
>So this means I don't have to add amanda to the group that has write >permission on the raw device. right? You have a group with write access to the raw device??? Ick. But the answer is yes, you are correct. When using GNU tar, the raw devices (and their permissions) are irrelevant. >Peter

Re: groups when using tar

2000-10-24 Thread Peter Schaffrath
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, John R. Jackson wrote: > >I'm familiar with the amanda user needing to be in the group > >allowed to read raw devices when using 'dump'. Is this also > >suffient when using 'tar' or do the file and directory permissions > >prevail? > > Amanda runs tar underneath a setuid-ro

Re: groups when using tar

2000-10-23 Thread John R. Jackson
>I'm familiar with the amanda user needing to be in the group >allowed to read raw devices when using 'dump'. Is this also >suffient when using 'tar' or do the file and directory permissions >prevail? Amanda runs tar underneath a setuid-root wrapper program, so it doesn't need any special permis

groups when using tar

2000-10-23 Thread peanut butter
Hi, I'm familiar with the amanda user needing to be in the group allowed to read raw devices when using 'dump'. Is this also suffient when using 'tar' or do the file and directory permissions prevail? -- Paul Yeatman(858) 534-9896 [EMAIL PROTECTED]