On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > ...so that tape drives become more cost-effective than storing
> > everything on HD's?
>
> >From my past experience, 50GB SLR100 tape costs $100 while for that
> price I can have a 500GB disk...
Recently I asked our sysadmin at work how much an LTO
Hi,
> ...so that tape drives become more cost-effective than storing
> everything on HD's?
>From my past experience, 50GB SLR100 tape costs $100 while for that
price I can have a 500GB disk...
Olivier
hi hi
...so that tape drives become more cost-effective than storing
everything on HD's?
does anyone has experience/ calculations on that topic he wants to
share?
greetz
olli