Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:17:10PM +0100, Rainer Hackel wrote:
>> Here an abstract of tho mail reports amanda send after a backup. The first
>> time it makes dumplevel 0 of backupdisk. The second time it makes dumplevel
>> 1 of the same disk. Why differs t
]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Jon LaBadie
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2005 16:07
>An: amanda-users@amanda.org
>Betreff: Re: no different dumpsize between level 0 and 1
>
>On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:17:10PM +0100, Rainer Hackel wrote:
>> Here an abstract of
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Jon LaBadie
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2005 16:07
An: amanda-users@amanda.org
Betreff: Re: no different dumpsize between level 0 and 1
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:17:10PM +0100, Rainer Hackel wrote:
> Here an abstract of tho mail r
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:17:10PM +0100, Rainer Hackel wrote:
> Here an abstract of tho mail reports amanda send after a backup. The first
> time it makes dumplevel 0 of backupdisk. The second time it makes dumplevel
> 1 of the same disk. Why differs the size that less? Looks more like if both
> w
Here an abstract of tho mail reports amanda send after a backup. The first
time it makes dumplevel 0 of backupdisk. The second time it makes dumplevel
1 of the same disk. Why differs the size that less? Looks more like if both
were complete backups. Someone can help?
-backupdisk 0 20166900 2016690
