Hi All,
So one of my disks crashed before I had time to test all the DVD's I
backed up to can be read, so I'm currently testing that now... :-/
Haven't had any read errors yet, but I'm keeping my fingers crossed :)
BTW, it was actually one disk of nice and fast RAID 0 (so I'm
restoring to t
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:29:43AM +0100, Laurence Darby wrote:
> BTW, it was actually one disk of nice and fast RAID 0 (so I'm
> restoring to the one good disk). Does anybody know if data recovery from
> it would be possible? I hope *not*, since I'm sending it back under
> waranty, and I can't er
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:29:43AM +0100, Laurence Darby wrote:
> > BTW, it was actually one disk of nice and fast RAID 0 (so I'm
> > restoring to the one good disk). Does anybody know if data recovery from
> > it would be possible? I hope *not*, since
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 09:41:39AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > I've had quite good luck doing poor man's data recovery. Boot the
> > machine into Knoppix or like ilk and use dd_rescue to copy the disk to
> > an image file or another disk. dd_rescue is smart about skipping
> > areas of th
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 09:41:39AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > I've had quite good luck doing poor man's data recovery. Boot the
> > > machine into Knoppix or like ilk and use dd_rescue to copy the disk to
> > > an image file or another disk. dd_rescue is smar
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 03:13:39PM +0100, Laurence Darby wrote:
> This is besides the point, but that wont work, and I'm not sure if you
> completely understand the situation. I *DON'T* want data to be
> recovered from the drive, and because I'm returning it under warranty, I
> want the data on it
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 03:14:40PM +0100, Laurence Darby wrote:
> Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 09:41:39AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > > > I've had quite good luck doing poor man's data recovery. Boot the
>
> This is besides the point, but that wont work, and I
Jon LaBadie wrote:
>
> I wonder about returning it under warranty.
> If the data has sufficient sensitivity, it might be easiest
> to eat the cost of a new replacement drive. The net-cost
> would be reduced by the time spent trying to destroy the data.
>
I'm trying to get the warranty replac
On Sunday 06 August 2006 13:14, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 03:14:40PM +0100, Laurence Darby wrote:
>> Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 09:41:39AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > > > I've had quite good luck doing poor man's data recovery. Boot
>> > > > the
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 03:13:39PM +0100, Laurence Darby wrote:
> > This is besides the point, but that wont work, and I'm not sure if
> > you completely understand the situation. I *DON'T* want data to be
> > recovered from the drive, and because I'm returning it under
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
