Re: selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-11-12 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
when running amcheck: WARNING: tempserv1: selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK The planner debug file has lines like the following: planner: time 0.099: connect_portrange: connect to 192.168.52.131.10080 failed:\ Connection refused planner: stream_client: Could not bind to port in

selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-11-12 Thread jfs10
: tempserv1: selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK The planner debug file has lines like the following: planner: time 0.099: connect_portrange: connect to 192.168.52.131.10080 failed:\ Connection refused planner: stream_client: Could not bind to port in range 5 - 50040. planner

Re: new instlal, selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-02-01 Thread jo...@msli.com
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 12:48 -0600, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:36 PM, jo...@msli.com wrote: > > Should I file a bug some place? I'm not finding the bug page. > > We don't have a publicly-visible bug page at the moment. I'll take > care of it some time soon. If you'd l

Re: new instlal, selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-02-01 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:36 PM, jo...@msli.com wrote: > Should I file a bug some place?  I'm not finding the bug page. We don't have a publicly-visible bug page at the moment. I'll take care of it some time soon. If you'd like to make up a patch and post it to the list, I can take care of it e

Re: new instlal, selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-02-01 Thread jo...@msli.com
Should I file a bug some place? I'm not finding the bug page. On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 12:22 -0600, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:13 PM, jo...@msli.com wrote: > > I'm wondering if these circular document loops are helpful or needed. > > Yes, we should take them out of the ma

Re: new instlal, selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-02-01 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:13 PM, jo...@msli.com wrote: > I'm wondering if these circular document loops are helpful or needed. Yes, we should take them out of the manpage. Thanks! Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com

Re: new instlal, selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-02-01 Thread jo...@msli.com
Perfect. Setting the one entery in /etc/amanda/Monthly_Mother/disklist to localhost did it. Thank you! After I follow man amanda-auth(7) carefully, I'll try bsdtcp. BTW, a quick read through man amanda-auth(7), for more detailed information, it sends me to http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Serv

Re: new instlal, selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-02-01 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:37 AM, jo...@msli.com wrote: > Where do I read about why mother_inner isn't local? You need to use the hostname 'localhost'. If this is a problem, you should set up BSDTCP instead. Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com

Re: new instlal, selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-02-01 Thread jo...@msli.com
ocal? On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 10:58 -0600, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:32 AM, jo...@msli.com wrote: > > I am trying to solve an amcheck error. > > "Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check" errors with"selfcheck request failed: > > timeout

Re: new instlal, selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-02-01 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:32 AM, jo...@msli.com wrote: > I am trying to solve an amcheck error. > "Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check" errors with"selfcheck request failed: > timeout waiting for ACK". You're using BSD authentication, which is notoriously tricky t

new instlal, selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-02-01 Thread jo...@msli.com
I am trying to solve an amcheck error. "Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check" errors with"selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK". I am simply trying to backup the local host (mother_inner) to a local tape drive (HP-LTO4). T his is amanda-2.6.1_p2 on a 64bit gentoo m

Re: selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK (with secondary addr on eth0 only)

2008-02-29 Thread Luc Lalonde
Thanks, that did the trick (added bind address)... ­>Force the listen address in the relevant xinetd.d file. This will do the > trick. -- Luc Lalonde, analyste - Département de génie informatique: Éole polytechnique de Montréal

Re: selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK (with secondary addr on eth0 only)

2008-02-28 Thread Francis Galiegue
er, if I do it with the secondary addr (192.168.1.25), I > get this message: > > WARNING: secon-ip: selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK > > Where, secon-ip is 192.168.1.25. I did a "tcpdump -A -v -v udp port > 10080" and it confirms that the Amanda s

selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK (with secondary addr on eth0 only)

2008-02-28 Thread Luc Lalonde
0:6546/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever When I do an "amcheck" on the primary addr (192.168.1.23) , all is fine... However, if I do it with the secondary addr (192.168.1.25), I get this message: WARNING: secon-ip: selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting fo