Re: vtape, end of tape waste

2006-05-24 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Ian Turner wrote: > On Tuesday 23 May 2006 16:28, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > But running out of disk space caused me to look more > > closely at the situation and I realized that the failed > > taping is left on the disk. This of course mimics what > > happens on physical tape. H

Re: vtape, end of tape waste

2006-05-23 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:28:31PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > But running out of disk space caused me to look more > closely at the situation and I realized that the failed > taping is left on the disk. This of course mimics what > happens on physical tape. However with the file:driver > if this

Re: vtape, end of tape waste

2006-05-23 Thread Ian Turner
Jon, There is no good short-term solution to this problem. Sorry. :-( Tape spanning helps, but is not a panacea. This is one of the limitations of the vtape API that I was talking about -- it tries to reimplement tape semantics on a filesystem, even when that doesn't make sense. When the Devi

vtape, end of tape waste

2006-05-23 Thread Jon LaBadie
I'm running vtapes on a new server. The vtapes are split across two external disk drives. Realizing that some tapes would not fill completely, I decided that rather than define the tape size to be exactly disk/N, I would add a fudge factor to the size. Things worked exactly as anticipated. The