On Thursday, January 9, 2020 1:03:36 PM CET Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> If as Soren says SQLite has improved and is really scaling to large
> collections (we talk in several thousands of tracks, DJ sampling can get
> very large indeed), I have nothing against it, but we need to keep the
> server
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 12:55, Bennett Piater wrote:
>
>
> Where is that discussion taking place, if I may ask?
>
> On the devel list, of course. Please modify the subject header when you
reply to a thread, else you are breaking it.
...
FWIW, arch linux dropped amarok to AUR (unsupported) with the
Hi Pedro,
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 12:56, Pedro de Carvalho Gomes
wrote:
> Hi Myriam,
>
> What about deprecating Mysql embedded, and supporting MariaDB instead? It
> seems the natural path since it still has libmysqld.
>
> The problem lies in the "still" has, how can we be sure this will persist
in
Hi Myriam,
Maybe as a starting point somebody could just outline the requirements
for the replacement of the embedded MySQL i.e.
Capacity, Speed, Ease of use (i.e. usable by non-techos), available on
all amarok platforms, etc.
Or to look at this differently, indicate the reasons why SQLite
Hi Myriam,
What about deprecating Mysql embedded, and supporting MariaDB instead? It
seems the natural path since it still has libmysqld.
Regards,
Pedro
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 4:31 PM Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 10:11, subscription1
> wrote:
>
>> Given tha
On 2020-01-08 13:00, amarok-devel-requ...@kde.org wrote:
How about leaving the website as it is for now? I don't know where you
checked, but 2.9 is the latest version specified, the screenshots have
not
been changed because there were no UI changes done between versions. So
if
it bothers you i
