> Hey there,
>
> First, thanks for the effort of discussing documentation related issues
(there
> are quite some) in Amarok, but...
>
> I'm *all* for doing this the other way around:
> Better put the class/architectural documentation into the source code as
far
> as possible. Qt does that very heav
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 22:07, Kevin Funk wrote:
> Thursday 07 July 2011, Sandeep :
>> Hi,
>>
>> The explanation in PlaylistModelStack.h about the playlist model
>> architecture is quite useful. It might be a good idea to include it in the
>> playlist section in this page:
>> http://amarok.kde.org/
Thursday 07 July 2011, Sandeep :
> Hi,
>
> The explanation in PlaylistModelStack.h about the playlist model
> architecture is quite useful. It might be a good idea to include it in the
> playlist section in this page:
> http://amarok.kde.org/wiki/Development/Architecture.
>
> I also suggest that
Hi,
The explanation in PlaylistModelStack.h about the playlist model
architecture is quite useful. It might be a good idea to include it in the
playlist section in this page:
http://amarok.kde.org/wiki/Development/Architecture.
I also suggest that the following link:
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/lates
