On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
> On 10. 5. 2013 Mark Kretschmann wrote:
>> Using this nice C++11 compiler support comparison [1], I tried to
>> determine which compiler versions could suffice as a baseline for us,
>> supporting most of C++11's core features:
>>
>> GCC 4.6, Cl
On 10. 5. 2013 Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> Using this nice C++11 compiler support comparison [1], I tried to
> determine which compiler versions could suffice as a baseline for us,
> supporting most of C++11's core features:
>
> GCC 4.6, Clang 3.1, MSVC 11.
>
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Patrick von Reth wrote:
>> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
>> > On 8. 5. 2013 Patrick von Reth wrote:
>> >> For the official builds we are still using gcc 4.4.7 and we probably
>> >> won't
>> >> switch to 4.8 before we switch to qt5. But for a
> Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 01:14:52 +0200
> Subject: Re: C++11
> From: kretschm...@kde.org
> To: amarok-devel@kde.org
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
> > On 8. 5. 2013 Patrick von Reth wrote:
> >> For the official builds we are still usin
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
> On 8. 5. 2013 Patrick von Reth wrote:
>> For the official builds we are still using gcc 4.4.7 and we probably won't
>> switch to 4.8 before we switch to qt5. But for a amarok only build, I
>> already did some testing and got a working build wi
On 8. 5. 2013 Patrick von Reth wrote:
> For the official builds we are still using gcc 4.4.7 and we probably won't
> switch to 4.8 before we switch to qt5. But for a amarok only build, I
> already did some testing and got a working build with gcc 4.8. For msvc, we
> are currently using msvc10, and
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Edward Toroshchin
wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:50:26PM +0200, Mark Kretschmann wrote:
>> I'd really like to start using some C++11 features in Amarok. It has been
>> argued that only few compilers support all of C++11's features at this
>> point, and that we
has c++11 support)
before we switch to qt5.
Cheers
Patrick
> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 15:51:28 +0200
> From: edward.ha...@gmail.com
> To: amarok-devel@kde.org
> Subject: Re: C++11
>
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:50:26PM +0200, Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> > I'd really like to st
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:50:26PM +0200, Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> I'd really like to start using some C++11 features in Amarok. It has been
> argued that only few compilers support all of C++11's features at this
> point, and that we therefore couldn't use C++11.
I support going to C++11. Probab
