Thanks Michael,
Sorry, stupid brain. Was testing with correct filter but never changed the
amavisd.conf. Sorry to trouble you all.
Regards,
Ben
From: Michael Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new ldap lookups "can't call method
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:21:25AM +, Ben Booble wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am running Mandrake LE2005, openldap-servers-2.2.23-5,
> amavisd-new-2.2.1-2, perl-5.8.6-6, perl-ldap-0.31-2.
>
> I use sasl (libsasl2-plug-digestmd5-2.1.19-12) for authentication with the
> ldap server. I have sendma
> Maybe amavis is not using
> /home/amavis/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> Look in the /tmp/salog file you created to find where amavis actually
> finds your spamassassin configuration files. Pay attention to this
> section:
> debug: using "/etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre" for site rules init.p
Thanks Brian,
Okay, kind of following your advise I increase the timeout in amavisd.conf
to 20 for the ldap_enable section. This had no effect.
I have verified with ldapsearch that uid=admin can access the details using
those supplied in the amavisd.conf from the server running amavis.
I d
Hi,
is the default behavious to block encrypted ZIPs ?
to ALLOW encrypted ZIPs, do I need, from amavis-conf-sample this stuff:
$banned_namepath_re = new_RE(
# allow crypted leaf members regardless of their name or type
[ qr'(?# ALLOW IF ENCRYPTED )^ (.*\t)? A=C (\t.*)? \z'xmi => 0 ],
Lars,
> An upgrade of amavisd-new to version 2.3.1 breaks our notification
> policy. The old version had a simple patch to disable notifications of
> mass mailing viruses.
> # } elsif (! defined($msginfo->sender_contact) ) {
> # do_log(5,"do_virus: skip recip notifications for unk. senders");
Hi,
I'm still having problems with my crap_lovers...
how can I test/debug this ?
I have like:
/etc/amavisd.conf
-
..
$virus_quarantine_to = 'infected@'; # fwd to MTA for delivery
@virus_lovers_maps = (
read_hash("/var/amavis/virus_lovers"),
);
@spam_lovers_maps = (
read_hash("/var/amavis/s
bart wrote:
>>> How to resolve this problem ?
>>>
>>> SpamAssassin version 3.0.3
>>> running on Perl version 5.8.0
>>> amavisd-new 2.3.1
>>> razor 2.67
Upgrade your Perl. The 5.8.0 had several issues regarding taint checks.
(or turn off taint checking, if that is acceptable)
> but if I
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:52:18PM +0100, Ed W wrote:
> Does no one else have any suggestions on how to reduce memory usage, or
> how to debug why Spamassassin seems to be gulping so much ram?
Not at the moment. Actually, I was a bit shocked to see how much my
own RAM usage had gone up. I think
>> How to resolve this problem ?
>>
>> SpamAssassin version 3.0.3
>> running on Perl version 5.8.0
>> amavisd-new 2.3.1
>> razor 2.67
>>>Upgrade your Perl. The 5.8.0 had several issues regarding taint checks.
>>>(or turn off taint checking, if that is acceptable)
but if I start amavisd with de
Does no one else have any suggestions on how to reduce memory usage, or
how to debug why Spamassassin seems to be gulping so much ram?
Thanks
Ed W
Ed Wildgoose wrote:
If you are using some of the big domain blocking files (e.g. the
"bigevil" or Bill Stearns domain block lists) yes.
bart,
> I've upgarded amavisd to 2.3.1 and have problem with razor2
> Here is a debug from
> su amavis -c 'spamassassin -D -r < /tmp/mybox'
>
> debug: Razor2: spam report, response is "1".
> debug: leaving helper-app run mode
> debug: SpamAssassin: spam reported to Razor.
> 1 message(s) examined.
Hi
I've upgarded amavisd to 2.3.1 and have problem with razor2
Here is a debug from
su amavis -c 'spamassassin -D -r < /tmp/mybox'
debug: Razor2: spam report, response is "1".
debug: leaving helper-app run mode
debug: SpamAssassin: spam reported to Razor.
1 message(s) examined.
Insecure dependency
* Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> After the mail body (DATA) has been transmitted fully
> from amavisd back to Postfix, the data transfer is
> terminated by sending a standalone dot.
> The fwd-data-end is the time between sending the final dot
> to Postfix and receiving a SMTP status response
Ralf,
> From the statistic at log_level=3:
> fwd-data-end: 71 (40%),
> What does that represent? Which phase of the processing (the
> reinjection?) How can it be sped up?
After the mail body (DATA) has been transmitted fully
from amavisd back to Postfix, the data transfer is
terminated by sendi
Sven,
> I'm currently at odds with db_recover. Unlike db_verify, I can't
> seem to be able to tell it what database file it should check.
> How can I tell db_recover that it should work on
> e.g. /var/amavis/db/cache.db ?
I don't think you can, it supposedly recovers everything
in the bdb environ
Sophia,
> There is a few days that someone send some e-mails to one of out group
> domain that seems be spam . I want only one username can send an e-mail to
> this group and others cann't . How can I do it ? and how can I prevent an
> e-mails come to this group from another sender .
> I used amav
MJ,
> May 17 14:29:09 sune /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[27752]: INFO: no optional
> modules: unicore::PVA.pl DBD::mysql Sys::Hostname::Long Mail::SPF::Query
> Razor2::Client::Agent Net::CIDR::Lite Net::DNS::RR::SOA Net::DNS::RR::NS
> Net::DNS::RR::MX Net::DNS::RR::A Net::DNS::RR:: Net::DNS::RR::PTR
John,
> Florian Engelmann wrote:
> >>> mail mailq was full of emails deferred by this error. My setup worked
> >>> great in the history - so the error must be a result of one of the
> >>> last "apt-get upgrades".
>
> I thought I'd revive this thread, as I get rare messages that show this
> problem
>From the statistic at log_level=3:
fwd-data-end: 71 (40%),
What does that represent? Which phase of the processing (the
reinjection?) How can it be sped up?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450
Nicklas, Martin,
> It wil be the same bug reported here in regard to Courier:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amavis-user&m=111584415904600&w=2
This should fix it:
--- amavisd~Mon May 9 20:22:42 2005
+++ amavisd Mon May 23 17:35:34 2005
@@ -8639,3 +8639,7 @@
{ my(%needed_protocol
Andrzej,
> Below is a small patch against 2.3.1 that adds one sanity check w.r.t.
> version of SAVI-Perl.
>
> Using SAVI-Perl older than 0.20 causes amavisd-new not to start but instead
> eat all memory on load_data in sophos_savi_init(). SAVI-Perl 0.20 is the
> first version that introduced this
Hamie,
> I've been looking at the latest SQL integration with amavisd-new and
> just wondering if anyone else besides myself is interested in having a
> combination of the current quarantine options, with the files saved
> locally (Or in my case AFS), but the information about the quarantine
> kep
Hi!
I'm using amavisd-new with postfix. I need to bypass amavis based on sender
address/domain.. What's the best way to do this?
If I understand correctly, amavisd-new does not support this?
I need to bypass scanning when:
a) sender address/domain matches AND recipient address/domain matches.
24 matches
Mail list logo
