Hi,
I am unable to understand why this user is getting negative score, he is
sending relaying huge number of messages but amavis is not stoping and
insteady assigning a negative score. Any help would be appreciated.
Aug 8 00:42:51 mailgate2 postfix/smtpd[1762]: [ID 197553 mail.info]
5C5451F109C:
I've got a couple of sites where there are several domain names - and
quite a bit of spam gets through to users of the 'other' domains - yet
performance is fine for the master domain.
They're setup with all the main entries pointing to the 'master' domain
(e.g. acme.co.nz), and the others just ap
> Set this in your amavisd.conf; you'ill see ALL it:
> $sa_tag_level_deflt = undef;
>
that won't do it
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle P
boricua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > >>
| > >> X-Spam-Report is normally not provided by default because is it quite
chatty.
| > >> You have to request this one explicitly: $sa_spam_report_header=1;
| >
| > > i tried that still no x-spam-report i wonder if postfix need to reload?
| > I would
> >>
> >> X-Spam-Report is normally not provided by default because is it quite
> >> chatty.
> >> You have to request this one explicitly: $sa_spam_report_header=1;
>
> > i tried that still no x-spam-report i wonder if postfix need to reload?
> I would get rid of the headers that the other serv
boricua wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 23:28:40 +0200
> Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> boricua,
>>
>> > i did this but i still dont see x-spam-report
>>
>> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.93 required=6.31 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL,
>> > MISSING_SUBJECT, NO_REAL_NAME
>> > X-Spam-Level:
>>
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 23:28:40 +0200
Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> boricua,
>
> > i did this but i still dont see x-spam-report
>
> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.93 required=6.31 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL,
> > MISSING_SUBJECT, NO_REAL_NAME
> > X-Spam-Level:
>
> X-Spam-Report is normally
pepino.is-a-geek.org is a host with an A record, so I sent an email to
boricua(a)pepino.is-a-geek.org. I asked if he got it.
boricua wrote:
> i did
> and here are the headers
> Delivered-To: boricua(a)pepino.is-a-geek.org
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by pepino.i
boricua,
> i did this but i still dont see x-spam-report
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.93 required=6.31 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL,
> MISSING_SUBJECT, NO_REAL_NAME
> X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Report is normally not provided by default because is it quite chatty.
You have to request this one explicitly: $
Tony,
> We are having problems with amavis checking RAR, LHA, ARC and ZOO
> files. Some debugging shows that it's barfing at the exec() in
> fh_copy(), called by store_mgr(), called by do_unrar() and buddies.
> Aug 7 22:11:05 mymailserver-mail amavis[27962]: Decoding of
> msg-27957-2.rar (RAR a
boricua wrote:
> what is throwing me off is the x-spam status local they say yes but they go
> in inbox
That's what I assumed. The problem is, one of the other servers wrote
those headers, and then passed the message to you. They have one opinion of
what is considered spam, and your server has
mess-mate wrote:
> as i readed in that thread (spam in inbox), there must be a
> 'local_domains_maps' in amavisd.conf ??
> I've a local_domains_acl but not a ..maps.
> What about this ?
> mess-mate
> --
Older versions of amavisd-new use @local_domains_acl (among
as i readed in that thread (spam in inbox), there must be a
'local_domains_maps' in amavisd.conf ??
I've a local_domains_acl but not a ..maps.
What about this ?
mess-mate
--
Stay away from flying saucers today.
boricua wrote:
>> I would also change:
>> $sa_tag_level_deflt = 2.0;
>> to:
>> $sa_tag_level_deflt = undef;
>>
>> so YOUR amavisd-new will create a X-Spam-Report report on every mail, spam
>> or not.
>>
>> Gary V
>>
> i did this but i still dont see x-spam-report
> ontent-Dispositio
> I would also change:
> $sa_tag_level_deflt = 2.0;
> to:
> $sa_tag_level_deflt = undef;
>
> so YOUR amavisd-new will create a X-Spam-Report report on every mail, spam or
> not.
>
> Gary V
>
i did this but i still dont see x-spam-report
ontent-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.
Gary wrote:
> You can add as many domains you would like to @local_domains_maps.
> @local_domains_maps = ( [".$mydomain"] ["localhost"] [".despiertapr.com"] );
Sorry, I blew it there, was not paying attention. This should read:
@local_domains_maps = ( [".$mydomain", 'localhost', '.despiertapr.co
boricua wrote:
> below is sample of what i mean, i modified my amavis.conf to discfard bad
> headers, but if i dont do that this email which is spam would make it to
> inbox
> how do i know which headers are added by my server?
> shouldd the spam status local trigger the spam chk?
> Return-Pat
below is sample of what i mean, i modified my amavis.conf to discfard bad
headers, but if i dont do that this email which is spam would make it to inbox
how do i know which headers are added by my server?
shouldd the spam status local trigger the spam chk?
Return-Path: <>
Delivered-To: bad-heade
We are having problems with amavis checking RAR, LHA, ARC and ZOO
files. Some debugging shows that it's barfing at the exec() in
fh_copy(), called by store_mgr(), called by do_unrar() and buddies.
Evidence: (running amavis from command line, with debugging on)
-
19 matches
Mail list logo
