> > I just noticed that the debug-sa argument causes a little complaint
> > from SpamAssassin:
>
> >Argument "1,all" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at
> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 245.
>
> > Seems line 245 in SpamAssassin really does want a numeric,
Mike,
> I just noticed that the debug-sa argument causes a little complaint from
> SpamAssassin:
>
>Argument "1,all" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 245.
>
> Seems line 245 in SpamAssassin really does want a numeric, vs. the "
amavis wrote:
> I just noticed that the debug-sa argument causes a little complaint from
> SpamAssassin:
>Argument "1,all" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 245.
> Seems line 245 in SpamAssassin really does want a numeric, v
I just noticed that the debug-sa argument causes a little complaint from
SpamAssassin:
Argument "1,all" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 245.
Seems line 245 in SpamAssassin really does want a numeric, vs. the "1,all:
that's pas
fre, 19.08.2005 kl. 09.19 skrev KISHOR.MV:
> I am running sendmail on a RHEL ES 4.0 with amavisd-new dual-mta setup
> So I run the mail receive deamon at Port:25 forwarded to amavisd-new for
> scanning at port:10024
> which after scanning forwards the mail to mail delivery mta-tx at port:10025
>
On 8/19/05, Matt Juszczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone here run SpamAssassin AND Dspam at the same time? Any extra
> benefits?
>
> I'm skeptical. I love DSPAM, but I don't think they work well together,
> especially when you have lazy users who will refuse to train (it will just
> make th
Jochen,
> Are there any plans or patches to support the Postfix XCLIENT in AMaViS ?
No immediate plans. It is probably not much work,
but I never felt any need for that.
> In a dual SMTPD setup with AMaViS (2.3.2) I would like the first Postfix
> SMTPD to forward client MTA details via the XCLIE
Are there any plans or patches to support the Postfix XCLIENT in AMaViS ?
In a dual SMTPD setup with AMaViS (2.3.2) I would like the first Postfix
SMTPD to forward client MTA details via the XCLIENT to the second SMTPD
through AMaViS. XFORWARD works fine... but it's not quite the same as
XCLIENT.
In a process of deep
contemplation, Mark Martinec carefully constructed the following missive
on 8/19/2005 5:22 AM:
Justin,
I am finding quarantined emails to non-local users who are members of a
local mailman list using amavisd-new 2.3.2, postfix and spamassassin.
The quarantined email shows
Gary Conway,
> Having a pretty frustrating time here and would appreciate any help
> received. Testing the dual-sendmail / amavisd-new setup on a Solaris 9
> box for virus scanning only. For some reason the amavis child processes
> are not kick-starting the content scanners, dying being recreated
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:20:43AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt told us:
> * Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The -RC2 has some rather cosmetic changes over yesterday's RC1.
> >
> > Available at:
> > http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.3.3-rc2.tar.gz
>
> Seems to work here so far.
Justin,
> I am finding quarantined emails to non-local users who are members of a
> local mailman list using amavisd-new 2.3.2, postfix and spamassassin.
> The quarantined email shows the X-Spam headers, even though the final
> recipients are non-local.
...
> OK, this is odd. I was looking over th
Dale,
> Can someone help me with a configuration of amavisd-new and mysql??
> What I'm looking for is a simple set of instructions for the changes
> needed in amavisd.conf (and amavisd if needed).
The README.sql explains what needs to be done.
The only change in amavisd.conf needed is to assing a
Lets at least home msn takes this seriously or legit users of
spaces.msn.com will suffer colatteral damage, just as uk,geocities users
have.
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Fran
I am running sendmail on a RHEL ES 4.0 with amavisd-new dual-mta setup
So I run the mail receive deamon at Port:25 forwarded to amavisd-new for
scanning at port:10024
which after scanning forwards the mail to mail delivery mta-tx at port:10025
In the above setup I have two problems.
1. The pri
* Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The -RC2 has some rather cosmetic changes over yesterday's RC1.
>
> Available at:
> http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.3.3-rc2.tar.gz
Seems to work here so far.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite -
16 matches
Mail list logo
