On Mo, 22.08.2005, 16:29, Noel Jones sagte:
> At 06:42 AM 8/22/2005, Jochen Seifarth wrote:
>>I am currently setting up a Postfix dual-SMTPD configuration with AMaViS
>>in between in the SMTPDs. In this configuration I would like to implement
>>restrictions in the second SMTPD, based on spam score
Sorry for noise, the problem was fixed by applying the sanity permission
(1777) to the /tmp dir. I thought MIME::Parser also uses $TEMPBASE which
was amavisd is using as well.
regards,
Kenneth
Kenneth Oncinian wrote:
Good Morning list,
In the process of upgrading to amavisd-new 2.3.3, I als
Good Morning list,
In the process of upgrading to amavisd-new 2.3.3, I also upgraded my
perl modules via cpan. Then the following error occurs:
--snip--
Aug 23 08:48:55 arwen postfix/lmtp[12058]: 09A7C78B25: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=2, status=deferred (host
1
tir, 23.08.2005 kl. 00.45 skrev email builder:
[...]
> Everyone seems to use LMTP to connect to amavis, but is there a good reason
> for this?
Hmmm ... thanks for detailing all your software versions (not).
I use smtp from Postfix 2.2.5 to amavisd-new 2.3.2 and from amavisd-new
2.3.2 back to Po
> RR
> lookups in postfix's content_filter. Works fine, kind of The
> amavis
> servers are used in clumps a few minutes at a time. Turns out, as I
> was
> just
> told on the postfix list, the postfix LMTP client caches its
> connections,
> thus negating the whole purp
email builder wrote:
--- Jared Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
email builder wrote:
RR
lookups in postfix's content_filter. Works fine, kind of The amavis
servers are used in clumps a few minutes at a time. Turns out, as I was
just
told on the postfix list, the postfix LMTP
--- Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> email builder wrote on 23/08/2005 00:45:
> > Everyone seems to use LMTP to connect to amavis, but is there a good
> reason
> > for this?
>
> Hmm, all the Howtos I ever read about using amavis with postfix resolved
> to using smtp content_filter to d
--- Jared Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> email builder wrote:
>
> >>RR
> >>lookups in postfix's content_filter. Works fine, kind of The amavis
> >>servers are used in clumps a few minutes at a time. Turns out, as I was
> >>just
> >>told on the postfix list, the postfix LMTP client
email builder wrote:
RR
lookups in postfix's content_filter. Works fine, kind of The amavis
servers are used in clumps a few minutes at a time. Turns out, as I was
just
told on the postfix list, the postfix LMTP client caches its connections,
thus negating the whole purpose of having more
> RR
> lookups in postfix's content_filter. Works fine, kind of The amavis
> servers are used in clumps a few minutes at a time. Turns out, as I was
> just
> told on the postfix list, the postfix LMTP client caches its connections,
> thus negating the whole purpose of having more than one am
Adriel,
> I've recently set up an outgoing smtp server that scans outbound mail
> for spam and virii. Everything is working fine, except that I noticed
> that I set the quarantine dir variable inside /etc/amavisd.conf
> incorrectly. As a result, I have a few messages that were headed for
> quarant
Hi,
We have implemented three amavis servers and deployed them via DNS-based RR
lookups in postfix's content_filter. Works fine, kind of The amavis
servers are used in clumps a few minutes at a time. Turns out, as I was just
told on the postfix list, the postfix LMTP client caches its con
I've recently set up an outgoing smtp server that scans outbound mail
for spam and virii. Everything is working fine, except that I noticed
that I set the quarantine dir variable inside /etc/amavisd.conf
incorrectly. As a result, I have a few messages that were headed for
quarantining, but sinc
Gary wrote:
>> Is there another setting that would override this and make spamassassin
>> consider it was using a network test?
>> I ask because I received a spam message, which seemed to have a low score.
>> I manually added up the scores for each score set based on the rules listed
>> in the
Jeff wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to understand how the scoring is working through amavisd-new
> and spamassassin. According to the spamassassin docs,
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.ht
> ml#scoring_options
> score set 3 is used when Bayes is enabled and
>I would have to archive all the incoming and outgoing email coming to
>my MTA (essentially we only archive the mail-headers for 6 months).
If you mean *all* email vs. only quarantined email, look at postfix's
always_bcc option.
---
SF.Net e
At 06:42 AM 8/22/2005, Jochen Seifarth wrote:
I am currently setting up a Postfix dual-SMTPD configuration with AMaViS
in between in the SMTPDs. In this configuration I would like to implement
restrictions in the second SMTPD, based on spam scores calculated by
AMaViS via SpamAssassin, i.e. low s
MJ,
> One more question, do I need to add "use_bays 1" in
> my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf or it is default and
> no need to add?
man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
(it is on by default)
Mark
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Soft
Hi,
I'm trying to understand how the scoring is working through amavisd-new
and spamassassin. According to the spamassassin docs,
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.ht
ml#scoring_options
score set 3 is used when Bayes is enabled and network tests are enable
Hi Mark,
I would have to archive all the incoming and outgoing email coming to my
MTA (essentially we only archive the mail-headers for 6 months).
!!! Mail users are informed about this !!!
Our old mail-server used the "Archive Mail" feature of MailScanner to do
this job. Is there a feature sim
Mark,
thanks for your reply
>
> What problem are you trying to solve? The main purpose of XCLIENT is to
present a client identity to Postfix in order to let its
> restrictions see the presented id instead of the natural one.
> Since in the normal situation the first MTA is supposed to
> check all
Valli,
> I would have to archive all the incoming and outgoing email coming to my
> MTA (essentially we only archive the mail-headers for 6 months).
> !!! Mail users are informed about this !!!
>
> Our old mail-server used the "Archive Mail" feature of MailScanner to do
> this job. Is there a feat
* Valentin Schmid - ICSurselva AG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I would have to archive all the incoming and outgoing email coming to my MTA
> (essentially we only archive the mail-headers for 6 months).
> !!! Mail users are informed about this !!!
See postfix-users. Victor Duchovni has posted a howto s
Hi all,
I would have to archive all the incoming and outgoing email coming to my MTA
(essentially we only archive the mail-headers for 6 months).
!!! Mail users are informed about this !!!
Our old mail-server used the "Archive Mail" feature of MailScanner to do
this job.
(www.mailscanner.info)
Hi,
On 8/22/05, Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The version 2.3.3 has been released. Please find it at the usual location:
Thank you!
bye,
a
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 200
25 matches
Mail list logo
