Re: [AMaViS-user] max_allowed_packet

2006-02-03 Thread Danita Zanre
>I believe this is one of >those cases where this is specific to Maia. Yes, I see that now - I just originally saw the amavisd notice in the message, and asked here first :) - interestingly enough another thread was brewing on the Maia list at the very same time! Thanks. Danita ---

Re: [AMaViS-user] max_allowed_packet

2006-02-03 Thread Gary V
Danita wrote: > One of my customers got this error back trying to send mail: > The e- mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a > specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, > contact your system administrator.< > irisgateway.cale

[AMaViS-user] max_allowed_packet

2006-02-03 Thread Danita Zanre
One of my customers got this error back trying to send mail: The e- mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator.< irisgateway.caledonia.net #4.0.0 X- Post

Re: [AMaViS-user] Help with LDAP profiling

2006-02-03 Thread Michael Hall
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 11:20:05AM +0100, Paolo Cravero as2594 wrote: > Michael Hall wrote: > > >Per RFC 2252: > >>> > >>>6.4. Boolean > >>> ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 DESC 'Boolean' ) > >>> Values in this syntax are encoded according to the following BNF: > >>> boolean = "TRUE" / "

Re: [AMaViS-user] Re: Best way to train statistical DB's ?

2006-02-03 Thread BJ Dierkes
Felix Schwarz wrote: Wow.. hm. that should work for my one config. Howerver, Any ideas if mail.mydomain.com and www.mydomain.com are two different servers? I.e. Horde is on a different box than amavisd-new is. Somehow you have to get the data from the web host to the amavisd-new h

Re: [AMaViS-user] Performance/Accuracy Issues

2006-02-03 Thread Gary V
Ilo wrote: > Hi, > Im using amavisd-new ver 2.3.3 & postfix just block SPAM and the stats > that I get from the amavis.log file > using amavislogsumm.pl are as follows > Totals: > --- > 37439 : Mails > thereof > 0 : INFECTED > 4929 : SPAM Blocked >

Re: [AMaViS-user] Tracking down an issue

2006-02-03 Thread Gary V
Robert wrote: > Running Amavisd-new 2.3.3 with Postfix 2.2.8 and looking for some help trying > to track down an > issue recently come across. Last week, and again this morning, the queue > started piling up and found that amavisd was refusing connections, > tried restarting and it kept complaini

Re: [AMaViS-user] Re: Best way to train statistical DB's ?

2006-02-03 Thread Jakob Curdes
Try the command line option '--user="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"'. Do you use DSPAM with virtual users? We have many domains on the server and user postfix as MTA. We use the postfix virtual table to map mail addresses to system users, but all mail users (i.e. pop/imap accounts) are system accounts

[AMaViS-user] Re: Best way to train statistical DB's ?

2006-02-03 Thread Felix Schwarz
BJ Dierkes schrieb: > Felix Schwarz wrote: >>That depends on what filter you are using. SpamAssassin's bayes db >>itself can be used by different users. amavisd-new does currently only >>use one user. If you want to be able to report spam by your webmailer >>you should make sure that both are usin

Re: [AMaViS-user] anti-virus recommendations

2006-02-03 Thread bsd
Hi, I am using Clamav since three years strong and efficient. A lot of version upgrades so you must keep up to date... - FreeBSD 5.4 p8 - clamav-0.88 - postfix-2.2.8 - amavisd-new-2.3.3 - dcc-dccd-1.3.16 - razor-agents-2.77 This does a very nice job all together. We only have couple of hundr

[AMaViS-user] Re: Best way to train statistical DB's ?

2006-02-03 Thread Felix Schwarz
Hallo Jakob, Jakob Curdes schrieb: > I figured out a way to train dspam via mail forwarding but got stuck > in the user jungle - dspam wants to train the mail as user "nobody" > and dies because it cannot create the lock files for this user. Try the command line option '--user="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

[AMaViS-user] Re: Best way to train statistical DB's ?

2006-02-03 Thread Felix Schwarz
Hi BJ, BJ Dierkes schrieb: > I am using Horde Webmail. I have configured it so that when you > click "report as spam" it runs sa-learn against the email. Now, this > is being run as www-data (debian) I assume and therefore my question > is this: Are the statistics processed into a global database

Re: [AMaViS-user] Best way to train statistical DB's ?

2006-02-03 Thread BJ Dierkes
In addition to that, I have a similar inquiry. I am using Horde Webmail. I have configured it so that when you click "report as spam" it runs sa-learn against the email. Now, this is being run as www-data (debian) I assume and therefore my question is this: Are the statistics processed into

Re: [AMaViS-user] Help with LDAP profiling

2006-02-03 Thread Paolo Cravero as2594
Michael Hall wrote: Per RFC 2252: 6.4. Boolean ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7 DESC 'Boolean' ) Values in this syntax are encoded according to the following BNF: boolean = "TRUE" / "FALSE" Boolean values have an encoding of "TRUE" if they are logically true, and have an encoding of

[AMaViS-user] Best way to train statistical DB's ?

2006-02-03 Thread Jakob Curdes
Hello, I am wondering if anybody has a good suggestion how to train the statistical DB's that may be used by amavisd (through spamassassin) for classification, apart from the auto-training performed. We use the bayes db included in SA sa well as dspam. I figured out a way to train dspam via m

Re: [AMaViS-user] Help with LDAP profiling

2006-02-03 Thread Michael Hall
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:49:29AM +0100, Paolo Cravero as2594 wrote: > (07283-02) lookup_ldap([EMAIL PROTECTED]) matches, > result=(mail=>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]", amavisbypassviruschecks=>"true", > amavisviruslover=>"true") > > ... some SQL-related stuff ... > > (07283-02) lookup_ldap_attr(amav

Re: [AMaViS-user] Help with LDAP profiling

2006-02-03 Thread Paolo Cravero as2594
Andreas Schulze wrote: Andreas replied privately, but this might be of interest for all. ... some SQL-related stuff ... is it possible, that here amavisbypassviruschecks is unset by SQL stuff Not really, we do not do SQL user profiling. All SQL activity is related to Bayes and quaran