Mark Martinec wrote:
Hi Mark,
Version 2.4.1 of amavisd-new has been released:
sorry I did not test it out on RC1. I just found a typo/bug in LDAP.schema .
The objectClass definition misses the amavisSpamQuarantineCutoffLevel
attribute. The correct definition should be:
objectclass (
Hi,
I'm using Amavis 2.4.0 with Postfix 2.2.10 on Debian testing. Amavis
seems to work, at least the logfiles tell me so:
May 9 23:40:34 asterix amavis[19719]: (19719-02) Passed CLEAN,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], mail_id:
mhtShrj5F20W, Hits: -, 117 ms
Hi,
I'm using Amavis 2.4.0 with Postfix 2.2.10 on Debian testing. Amavis
seems to work, at least the logfiles tell me so:
May 9 23:40:34 asterix amavis[19719]: (19719-02) Passed CLEAN,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], mail_id:
mhtShrj5F20W, Hits: -, 117
Frank,
May 9 23:40:34 asterix amavis[19719]: (19719-02) Passed CLEAN,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED], ...
Amavis knows of my local domains (thelogic.org) but there are no Amavis
headers in recieved mails at all.
list.ee.ethz.ch != thelogic.org
Mark
Frank,
May 9 23:40:34 asterix amavis[19719]: (19719-02) Passed CLEAN,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], mail_id:
mhtShrj5F20W, Hits: -, 117 ms
Unfortunately there are no Amavis headers in recieved mails at all.
My domains are know by Amavis:
Hi Gary,
Gary V lists at johnmecham.com writes:
On a stock Debian install spam and virus checks are disabled by
default. Have you enabled them? If I recall, look in
15-content_filter_mode.
I have not enabled them but I think they were enabled by default:
use strict;
# You can modify this
Mark,
Mark Martinec Mark.Martinec+amavis at ijs.si writes:
Still no headers from Amavis:
Hits: - indicates that SA was not even called.
Either it is disabled/bypassed, or sender is black/whitelisted,
or mail size was over the $sa_mail_body_size_limit.
I don't think that it's disabled as
Frank,
I don't think that it's disabled as every line is a comment on
15-content_filter_mode. I did not change/create black/whitelists
and the mail was very small (body contained only one word).
It must be specific to Debian as Gary notes. Check port documentation.
It is not disabled in the
Gary wrote:
It's the double negatives and the perverse method of undoing one
setting by enabling another setting that is confusing. It would have
been better if they had left it alone and simply had:
# @bypass_virus_checks_maps = (1); # uncomment to DISABLE anti-virus code
#
Gary V lists at johnmecham.com writes:
Do you know how to configure Amavis to add X-Spam headers to every mail
no matter how high the spam results are?
You mean no matter how low.
Yes :)
What domain was the mail addressed to? It's possible $mydomain has a
bad value. You may want to set it
Frank wrote:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: spam-quarantine
X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Quarantine-ID: Z4hblQoPWNah
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 1000
X-Spam-Level:
Gary,
Gary V lists at johnmecham.com writes:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=1000 tag=-999 tag2=5 kill=10 tests=[GTUBE=1000]
Everything looks OK. You dug this one out of the local quarantine.
Is there another MTA or MUA that may be removing the headers as the
non-spam mail makes its way to your
Dear All,
MailZu is a simple and intuitive web interface to manage Amavisd-new
quarantine. Users can view their own quarantine, release/delete
messages or request the release of messages. MailZu is written in PHP
and requires Amavisd-new version greater than 2.3.0.
MailZu's new website is now:
13 matches
Mail list logo
