Hi,
can someone comment or give me suggestions to my questions?
Andi Voss schrieb:
As I undestand it right, the TO: is changed into andi+spam and the mail
ist still delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - right?
So the local mailer or cyrus/sieve or something other can filter the TO:
header and put
Can we get some DKIM documentation that isn't completely focused on
Postfix? ...
| Correction: you do have some choice there in a sendmail milter setup,
| through the order of milters. Later milters see effects of earlier ones,
| so an order like: verify, amavisd-new, sign would achieve the
Gary V wrote:
nick wrote:
Just a stupid question but I have some users who want to recieve banned
files, however, they aren't local users, and I don't have every single
address (I just catachall and forward), I'd like the acl to include the
entire domain, to ease administration..
how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary V schrieb:
Robert wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
are there any examples online with having
amavis-new not configured on localhost
working with postfix
for exmaple ,if i want share the amavis service on a special host between
multiple
Noticed that the archive quarantine is missing two small config items wrt LDAP.
Apologize for the lack of a clean patch, but these are trivial changes.
(a) missing from the list of attrs loaded from LDAP:
@@ -11144,7 +11145,7 @@
amavisLocal amavisMessageSizeLimit amavisWarnVirusRecip
been playing with archive quarantine to feature in 2.4.3. First let me just
say ... very nice.
However, I noticed that archive quaratine to is checked only on RCPT TO addrs
and not for MAIL FROM addrs. This means that amavisd-new is only able to
archive inbound mail.
Suppose we host the
Andi wrote:
Hi,
can someone comment or give me suggestions to my questions?
Andi Voss schrieb:
As I undestand it right, the TO: is changed into andi+spam and the mail
ist still delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - right?
So the local mailer or cyrus/sieve or something other can filter the TO:
Hi,
So you understand what is happening, our setup currently removes banned
extensions but delivers the email body while virus emails are dropped.
Now the question, is it possible to do the virus scan before the banned
attachment check?
We've run in to a case where a virus is sending itself
David wrote:
Hi,
So you understand what is happening, our setup currently removes banned
extensions but delivers the email body while virus emails are dropped.
Are you using something other than amavisd-new to remove the
attachment?
Now the question, is it possible to do the virus scan
Gary wrote:
It's quite possible the virus is not detected by your anti-virus
software.
Or you have patched amavisd-new and your patch modifies the body prior
to being scanned. If you have patched amavisd-new, have you had real
viruses detected since you patched?
Gary V
Gary V wrote:
Gary wrote:
It's quite possible the virus is not detected by your anti-virus
software.
Or you have patched amavisd-new and your patch modifies the body prior
to being scanned. If you have patched amavisd-new, have you had real
viruses detected since you patched?
On 9/30/06, Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Version amavisd-new-2.4.3 has been released.
It is available at:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.4.3.tar.gz
Version 2.4.3 fixes known problems in 2.4.2, adds a couple of
workarounds for Perl problems and adds few smaller
12 matches
Mail list logo
