[AMaViS-user] Fwd: custom hooks: how to ban a message

2007-10-31 Thread Jeremy Laidman
Mark, thanks for your helpful response. On 10/31/07, Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I do the same per-recipient if I wanted to? Yes, add_contents_category is a property of each recipient (and also a property of a message as a whole, see 'blocking contents category' in 2.5.0

[AMaViS-user] overrule SA rules dirs

2007-10-31 Thread Leo Baltus
Hi list, We are using amavisd-new 2.5.2 and SA 3.2.3 quite happily. I would like to overrule the default directory where SA expects its configuration, rules and updated rules. I know I can configure this 'compile'time but I would like to define these directories for each instance. I believe

Re: [AMaViS-user] Send .exe files

2007-10-31 Thread Jordi Espasa Clofent
MTA will need to map these privileged accounts to a content filter port number, so that you could assign appropriate policy bank to it. The simplest would be to provide a separate smtpd postfix service for them (with its own -o content_filter setting), accessible only to these authorized

[AMaViS-user] amavisd-new not binding to inet_socket_port 1024 ;

2007-10-31 Thread Robert Gomezi
Hi, I want to run amavisd-new on low ports (ports 1024), however when I set $inet_socket_port to values lower than 1024 it won't start up am I missing something obvious or is this by design ? brgds, robert - This SF.net

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new not binding to inet_socket_port 1024 ;

2007-10-31 Thread Michael Scheidell
-Original Message- From: Robert Gomezi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 7:55 AM To: Michael Scheidell Cc: AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new not binding to inet_socket_port 1024 ; Michael, Thanks for

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new not binding to inet_socket_port 1024 ;

2007-10-31 Thread Robert Gomezi
Michael, Thanks for cluebatting me. I checked the startup script in /etc/init.d/amavisd I'm using amavisd-new from rpmforge on Centos 5 That invokes amavis as user 'amavis' If I just invoke amavisd as /usr/sbin/amavisd with $inet_socket_port = 25 and daemon_user/daemon_group set = 'amavis' then

[AMaViS-user] Is the 354 Please start mail input configurable?

2007-10-31 Thread Ken Morley
I use a mail filter comprised of Amavisd-new, Postfix, ClamAV, etc. I'm having problems receiving e-mail from a major US corporation. When I examine the logs, I find that the sender asserts the DATA command and Amavisd replies with 354 Please start mail input.. The sender's server acts as if it

Re: [AMaViS-user] Is the 354 Please start mail input configurable?

2007-10-31 Thread Mark Martinec
Ken, I use a mail filter comprised of Amavisd-new, Postfix, ClamAV, etc. I'm having problems receiving e-mail from a major US corporation. When I examine the logs, I find that the sender asserts the DATA command and Amavisd replies with 354 Please start mail input.. The sender's server

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new not binding to inet_socket_port 1024 ;

2007-10-31 Thread Clifton Royston
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 07:54:35PM +0800, Robert Gomezi wrote: Michael, Thanks for cluebatting me. I checked the startup script in /etc/init.d/amavisd I'm using amavisd-new from rpmforge on Centos 5 That invokes amavis as user 'amavis' If I just invoke amavisd as /usr/sbin/amavisd with

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new not binding to inet_socket_port 1024 ;

2007-10-31 Thread Clifton Royston
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:53:36AM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 07:54:35PM +0800, Robert Gomezi wrote: Michael, Thanks for cluebatting me. I checked the startup script in /etc/init.d/amavisd I'm using amavisd-new from rpmforge on Centos 5 That invokes amavis as

Re: [AMaViS-user] Is the 354 Please start mail input configurable?

2007-10-31 Thread Ken Morley
I use a mail filter comprised of Amavisd-new, Postfix, ClamAV, etc. I'm having problems receiving e-mail from a major US corporation. When I examine the logs, I find that the sender asserts the DATA command and Amavisd replies with 354 Please start mail input.. The sender's server acts

Re: [AMaViS-user] Is the 354 Please start mail input configurable?

2007-10-31 Thread Clifton Royston
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 05:30:48PM -0400, Ken Morley wrote: I use a mail filter comprised of Amavisd-new, Postfix, ClamAV, etc. I'm having problems receiving e-mail from a major US corporation. When I examine the logs, I find that the sender asserts the DATA command and Amavisd

Re: [AMaViS-user] Is the 354 Please start mail input configurable?

2007-10-31 Thread Mark Martinec
Ken, Oct 19 14:57:06 maildrop amavisd[17042]: (17042-06) ESMTP MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] size=2024177\r\n A 2 MB mail. Oct 19 14:57:06 maildrop amavisd[17042]: (17042-06) ESMTP 354 End data with CRLF.CRLF Oct 19 14:57:06 maildrop amavisd[17042]: (17042-06) switch_to_client_time 120 s,

Re: [AMaViS-user] custom hooks: how to ban a message

2007-10-31 Thread Mark Martinec
Jeremy, Don't set recip_done to true, just add_contents_category(). OK, but... If you do set recip_done, you must also set recip_smtp_response(...), indicating the success status of a delivery that you pretended to have done. So I could do this if I wanted to have control over the

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new not binding to inet_socket_port 1024 ;

2007-10-31 Thread Mark Martinec
Robert, I checked the startup script in /etc/init.d/amavisd I'm using amavisd-new from rpmforge on Centos 5 That invokes amavis as user 'amavis' If I just invoke amavisd as /usr/sbin/amavisd with $inet_socket_port = 25 and daemon_user/daemon_group set = 'amavis' then it binds correctly

Re: [AMaViS-user] Is the 354 Please start mail input configurable?

2007-10-31 Thread Mark Martinec
Ken, P.S. capturing a SMTP session on a loopback interface might provide a clue to what is happeneing. Do not forget a '-s 0' option to a tcpdump, e.g.: tcpdump -i lo0 -s 0 -n -w 0.log 'tcp port 10024' Mark - This SF.net

Re: [AMaViS-user] Many hanging processes

2007-10-31 Thread Claude Frantz
Xavier Beaudouin wrote: I have also this kind of problems... I think it is more related to SpamAssassin because I had to disable all spam scanning on my system to get it working again. You are right, Xavier, but my problem is that the scanning of the same message occurs in many parallel