Jules M schrieb:
> If you want to try, my actual diff against v2.6.1 looks like this:
If you do not mind I would like to publish that on the website.
I did not find the time to update my own amavisd yet; that's why I still
have no own patch for v2.6...
--
Martin
--
Peter Sørensen schrieb:
> Is it nessecary to patch amavisd-new to make this work - meaning make the
> X-CRM114-CacheID header generated by CRM114 available in the mail?
The scoring itself works without.
But to write the CacheIDs into the mail header (to make use of the
crm114 cache) the patch i
Am 04.08.2008 um 15:04 schrieb Peter Sørensen:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to test the CRM114 spamassassin plugin.
> I have a question regarding this.
>
> Is it nessecary to patch amavisd-new to make this work - meaning
> make the
> X-CRM114-CacheID header generated by CRM114 available in the mail?
Is there a way to bypass all checks on a per user basis? If so is it a
text file or can it be done via database
***
This email message and any files transmitted with it are intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity for whom it is addressed. It
may contai
Hi,
I would like to test the CRM114 spamassassin plugin.
I have a question regarding this.
Is it nessecary to patch amavisd-new to make this work - meaning make the
X-CRM114-CacheID header generated by CRM114 available in the mail?
Any hints to this?
Regards
Peter Sorensen/University of
Hi again,
because this mailing-list is available through google-search, I post the
following:
Use the Auxiliary amavis schema! You will find the amavisLocal-Bool.
Everything is working now. Sorry for asking silly things here.
So long
Christian
--
Roessner Network Solutions (R.N.S.)
Licher St
Hi again,
> I found many questions but no answers using Google. So I start my own
> luck here ;-)
No answer here means: Find your answer yourself or means nobody knows? :-)
If it is documented anywhere, please can somebody provide a link for me?
Or are there any plans for implementing such a f
