I take the opportunity of this thread to ask about one behaviour, that I
think is not uncommon. Has sense today to set defaults destiny values
for spam to D_BOUNCE? I mean this: today 99.9% of SPAM comes from
a faked email address, so bouncing it to the sender means to a faked
sender
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 18:49:37 troxlinux wrote:
Hi list , I am trying to install amavisd-new 2.6.1 in a centos 5.2,
but it shows me this error:
error: Failed dependencies:
/etc/clamd.d is needed by amavisd-new-2.6.1-1.noarch
I have installed clamav-0.94.2-1.el5.rf
some
2009/3/23 Nuno Fernandes npf-mli...@eurotux.com:
Do you have clamd-0.94.2-1.el5.rf installed?
yes have it installed
Nevertheless, clamd doesn't
have /etc/clam.d. For what it's seems your amavisd-new rpm has wrong
dependencies.
ok
Where did you find it?
Hi,
I use postfix with amavisd-new and penpals
With penpals the outgoing and the incoming mail must pass through amavisd.
It's OK for incoming with a content filter in postfix and a check in
amavis with spamassassin and amavis.
but for outgoing how to get outgoing mails only through penpals
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:07:24 +0100, LEVEAU Stanislas wrote:
Hi,
I use postfix with amavisd-new and penpals With penpals the outgoing and
the incoming mail must pass through amavisd. It's OK for incoming with a
content filter in postfix and a check in amavis with spamassassin and
amavis.
Thank Thomas
For example :
Incoming mail : use the existing default policy bank (it has no name).
This bank
loads the settings in the config file (typically amavisd.conf).
Outgoing mail :
Postfix configuration in master.cf :
127.0.0.1:2525 inet n - n - - smtpd
-o
Current version: 2.5.3, LDAP, Posfix on Solaris 10.
We are experiencing the issue that when users have
amavisBypassVirusCheck set to TRUE, mails containing password-protected
zips, or zips that trigger the expantionQuota, will modify the Subject
to ***UNCHECKED***.
Since the user has asked for
