* Mikael Bak :
> Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> >> I think you misunderstand me.
> >> I say the user actively tell amavisd-new to mark the quarantined email
> >> for deletion. Then the cronscript deletes only those marked for deletion
> >> and probably those that has been released.
> >
> > You are r
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> I think you misunderstand me.
>> I say the user actively tell amavisd-new to mark the quarantined email
>> for deletion. Then the cronscript deletes only those marked for deletion
>> and probably those that has been released.
>
> You are right. I misunderstood you.
>
* Mikael Bak :
> Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > * Michael Scheidell :
> >>
> >> Mikael Bak wrote:
> >>> IMHO not at all like that.
> >>> Amavisd-new should only do something like this:
> >>> UPDATE msgrcpt SET rs='D' WHERE mail_id=X
> >>>
> >>> Housekeeping is done by cronscripts.
> >>>
> >>>
>
* Michael Scheidell :
> Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > We run SA and anti-virus in pre-queue mode.
> >
> > We use Postfix' smtpd_proxy_filter and Postfix' Sendmail milter API.
> > smtpd_proxy_filter is more stable. Sometimes the milter on Postfix bails
> > out.
> > I haven't had time to investigat
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> We run SA and anti-virus in pre-queue mode.
>
> We use Postfix' smtpd_proxy_filter and Postfix' Sendmail milter API.
> smtpd_proxy_filter is more stable. Sometimes the milter on Postfix bails out.
> I haven't had time to investigate that any closer yet.
>
> In either ca
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Michael Scheidell :
>>
>> Mikael Bak wrote:
>>> IMHO not at all like that.
>>> Amavisd-new should only do something like this:
>>> UPDATE msgrcpt SET rs='D' WHERE mail_id=X
>>>
>>> Housekeeping is done by cronscripts.
>>>
>>>
>> I guess my point is, that releasing
