Hi folks,
Since an email relay sits mere seconds away from malware generation, one can
accept that not all viruses would get caught.. I've however heard reports
from downstream that a next relay in line is catching some viruses that got
missed by our amavisd-new setup. Also using ClamAV.
Now,
Hello,
We are using Postfix+amavisd-new on our server. We have set up virtual domains
and virtual aliases, and mail to a...@doma.in gets forwarded to
e...@other.domain. Nothing really weird, it's been working flawlessly since
several years.
We have a dual postfix setup (TCP/25 for external
Dear Voilaine,
On Feb 16, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Violaine Grimly wrote:
We have a dual postfix setup (TCP/25 for external incoming, TCP/587 for
internal incoming) and dual paths into amavisd-new (TCP/587 uses a policy
bank with 'originating = 1').
With the last version of Amavisd-new
Mark Martinec wrote the following on 12/02/10 19:45:
I've seen a marked increase in bad header reports which I paid little
attention to initially but I've just taken some time to look into some
of these as some of the senders are routers, webcams, etc where
previously these were not a problem.
Riaan,
Since an email relay sits mere seconds away from malware generation, one
can accept that not all viruses would get caught.. I've however heard
reports from downstream that a next relay in line is catching some viruses
that got missed by our amavisd-new setup. Also using ClamAV.
Violaine,
We are using Postfix+amavisd-new on our server. We have set up virtual
domains and virtual aliases, and mail to a...@doma.in gets forwarded to
e...@other.domain. Nothing really weird, it's been working flawlessly
since several years.
We have a dual postfix setup (TCP/25 for
Clay,
I just wanted to follow-up on this thread and mention that although I
did make the changes to postfix
(amavisd_initial_destination_concurrency, and
amavisd_destination_concurrency_limit) as suggested by Noel my issue was
still occurring.
However, I realized rather than a true reload
2010/2/16 Alrik Bronsema alr...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Why don't you clean the spam database on a regular basis. I run a nightly
script to delete spam older than 7 days. That gives the users enough time to
inspect the spam for false positives.
ok I understand that I have to have a script to make a
