>
> With amavisd-new-2.4.1 the list is compressed, successive same values
> are removed and represented by one number, so in the above example
> it would be only -1.814-3.
>
> Mark
>
Thanks Mark. That will definitely make things easier.
-Aaron
> From what I understand of it the 6.13 is the score returned by
> spamassassin. the +10 is what amavisd added to the score because of
> soft-whitelisting/soft-blacklisting. The final score that amavisd-new
> goes by is not listed. You would have to add the sums up. This way you
> can disting
On Tuesday 23 May 2006 12:45, Aaron Grewell wrote:
> Hello list, I'm trying to run amavislogsumm against my mail logs, and some
> of the scores are listed with a +10 at the end, which breaks the script.
> For example:
>
> May 23 10:17:22 216.186.73.25 amavis[7301]: (
Hello list, I'm trying to run amavislogsumm against my mail logs, and some of
the scores are listed with a +10 at the end, which breaks the script. For
example:
May 23 10:17:22 216.186.73.25 amavis[7301]: (07301-01-9) SPAM-TAG,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Yes, score=6.13+10
ta
Hi all,
I've been asked to add attachment renaming to our filtering, and was
wondering what everyone else is using. Our current setup uses
amavisd-new and postfix. What would be the best tool to add to the mix?
---
This SF.net email is sponso
