[AMaViS-user] under which circumstances RelayedOpenRelay?

Hi I've just switched from amavisd-new 2.5.4 to 2.7.0-pre14 and I've noticed {RelayedOpenRelay}. Feb 10 21:27:10 mail.notice host amavis[29895]: (29895-01) Passed CLEAN {RelayedOpenRelay}, [62.236.108.70]:57631 [83.103.80.66] dovecot-bounces+mailinglists=belfin...@dovecot.org -

Re: [AMaViS-user] p0f: is it interesting to use?

Mark, checking the p0f website last developments date back to 2006. No visible activity ever since. Yes. That's a pitty. Does it make sense today to use p0f to find out about the clients that connect to port 25? Or are p0f signatures completely outdated? Depends what you use them for.

[AMaViS-user] p0f: is it interesting to use?

Hi checking the p0f website last developments date back to 2006. No visible activity ever since. Does it make sense today to use p0f to find out about the clients that connect to port 25? Or are p0f signatures completely outdated? thanks, John

Re: [AMaViS-user] p0f: is it interesting to use?

Am 02.02.2011 18:00, schrieb Giampaolo Tomassoni: Hi checking the p0f website last developments date back to 2006. No visible activity ever since. Does it make sense today to use p0f to find out about the clients that connect to port 25? Or are p0f signatures completely outdated? In my own

Re: [AMaViS-user] p0f: is it interesting to use?

Am 02.02.2011 20:56, schrieb Giampaolo Tomassoni: I don't want to fight spam with p0f. My primary concern is to find out what sort of clients connect to my MX'es and use this information for statistical reasons. Is the detection good enough for that? I believe it is quite good in