> > I've a question about user preferences.
> > What if a mail has multiple addressees?
>
> Each recipient is treated individually, according to their preferences.
>
> > If they use different settings is it possible
> > that some of them receives a potential spam while others do not?
>
> Yes.
[.
Hi folks,
I've a question about user preferences.
What if a mail has multiple addressees?
If they use different settings is it possible
that some of them receives a potential spam while others do not?
How tagging does work in this case? Each recipients
get a different header with its own scores?
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 12:17 PM, Matias Banchoff wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have a question regarding the $forward_method variable.
> > I have two postfix servers and only one amavis server installed. Is
> > it possible to have amavis check mails from both postf
> I would like to reconfigure my setup to use AMaViS as a before-queue
> content filter -- rejecting messages scoring above 25 (or maybe 30),
> accepting (and quarantining) messages scoring between 5 and 25 (or
> 30), and delivering mail scoring below 5.
I guess before queue filtering and quaranti
Dear folks, especially developers,
I wonder if it is possible to introduce a new configuration
variable (let's say $sa_user) that could hold a username.
Amavisd should run spamassasin code with this uid, therefore
SA could use ~username/.spamassassin/user_prefs in order to customize
its rules.
Mor
> > ...Passed CLEAN [IPv6:] [IPv6:] ->
> > , ..., Hits: -3.107,... 3027 ms
> >
> > ...Passed CLEAN, NO_DSN [] [IPv6:] ->
> > , ..., Hits: -1.307,... 2325 ms
> >
> > ...Passed CLEAN, TRUSTED [IPv6:MTA2_IPv6] [IPv6:] > address> -> , ..., Hits: -,... 199 ms
>
> My theory is the following:
> MT
> My test mails from MTA0 went through MTA1, MTA2, and MTA1 again
> and back to MTA0. MTA1 and MTA2 are configured to use service of amavisd.
> Amavisd received them 3 times. I expected that effective scan
> will be done at first time only because when MTAs receive message
> from each other the par
> > In this context what does "client" mean? So far I thought it is the
> > MTA that passes mail to check to amavisd-new. However it seems that
> > Postfix somehow forwards the address of its SMTP client and amavisd
> > select policy bank upon this information.
>
> Indeed, it is the IP address of
> | What's new in amavisd-new 2.6.3:
> | - added a configuration variable @client_ipaddr_policy, which maps smtp
> | client's IP address lookup lists to a policy bank name.
>
> In this context what does "client" mean? So far I thought it is the
> MTA that passes mail to check to amavisd-new. Howev
Changelog writes:
| What's new in amavisd-new 2.6.3:
| - added a configuration variable @client_ipaddr_policy, which maps smtp
| client's IP address lookup lists to a policy bank name.
In this context what does "client" mean? So far I thought it is the
MTA that passes mail to check to amavisd-new
> > Is there any way to put a (cryptographically signed) certificate
> > into the header at the first scan like this "Already checked" ?
> > This mark could be recognized in all the following rounds so
> > amavisd could pass the message without further checks.
> >
> > A simple "Received: by ..." h
I have a spam filter host (actually it is a cluster but this does not matter)
that serves 2-3 MTAs simultaneously.
One of them is a list server the other is my smart host as well
as MX.
Now if I send a message to a mailing list. The following happens:
1. My desktop machine passes the mail to the s
12 matches
Mail list logo
