Re: [AMaViS-user] BAYES_99 false positive

2005-09-27 Thread Pedro Timoteo
Rob MacGregor wrote: IMO blocking messages that get a spam hit of as low as that (6.45) is asking for trouble - but it's your system. Why not quarantine instead of blocking, then you'll have a copy for running sa-learn on? I agree. Also, I prefer simply to tag messages with ***SPAM*** in the

Re: [AMaViS-user] Killing mails with spam hit superior to 9.00

2005-09-13 Thread Pedro Timoteo
Just a suggestion: from my experience, you're setting the discard limit too low. It'll probably block (without a trace) legitimate mails, maybe because of their "spammy" language. I usually discard above 25 or even 30. Of course, I have lots of optional stuff which add to the score, like Razor