Stuart Johnston wrote:
> Trey Nolen wrote:
>> On 12/8/06, Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Trey Nolen wrote:
>>>> We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
>>>> tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per d
Trey Nolen wrote:
> On 12/8/06, Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Trey Nolen wrote:
>>> We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
>>> tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
>>> starting to run
Trey Nolen wrote:
> We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
> tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
> starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are
> looking at amavisd-new as a replacement, but we have an issue with the
> spa
Permissions on that file don't seem to allow it to be downloaded.
Jack Stewart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, apologies for something that is a little off topic.
>
> There was some interest in this earlier and there seems to be some
> traction/complaints about what to do with images on this lis
Gary V wrote:
> Mark wrote:
>
>> Theo,
>
to change Mail::SpamAssassin to provide a suitable default
for LOCAL_STATE_DIR. Please consider this a feature request.
>>> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4952 :)
>
>> Appreciated!
>
# sa-update --updatedir /usr
I am also seeing this spam increase. I haven't found any legit message with
that boundary text but
I don't have a good corpus. Might make a good rule though.
Mike Cisar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry a bit off topic but just wondering if any other fellow Amavis-ites
> have been seeing insane amou
provide a fix. My solution was to add:
LOCAL_STATE_DIR => '/var/lib/',
to the Mail::SpamAssassin->new call.
Thanks,
Stuart Johnston
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm moving our content filtering from the frontend smtp-servers to an
> inside relay. After a test, I can see that while it seems to work ok,
> all spam is marked "Spam from local .
>
> How can I tell amavisd to ignore our incoming servers and report the
Terry wrote:
> I have seen a few things about this in my searches but no concrete
> answers and fixes. I am sure it is a configuration error on my part
> but I don't see where. I am getting negative hit scores for spam
> messages. Please reply with information that I can post that would
> help
I would like add to the amavisd-new SQL-storage in order to record the
spam tests that a message hit. This would be so that I can track how
often certain rules are hitting. Has anyone done this and would like to
share their implementation?
Thanks,
Stuart Johnston
Alexander Vranken wrote:
Is it possible to get local_domains list from SQL?
guzik
I'm very curious too. Is it possible?
Alexander
The default SQL setup does get local_domains from SQL using the
'users.local' field. See README.lookups and README.sql for details.
,
Stuart Johnston
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http
Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::MySQL requires MySQL 4.1. I believe
this error indicates that you are using an earlier version.
Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL will probably work if you don't want
to upgrade.
-Stuart
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello.
Thanks for you replay.
I tried to mi
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
man, 29.08.2005 kl. 18.22 skrev Stuart Johnston:
Occasionally amavisd-new crashes or locks-up and postfix sends messages
to the deferred queue with "connect to 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]: Connection
refused".
What is the best way to get postfix to try connecting
Occasionally amavisd-new crashes or locks-up and postfix sends messages
to the deferred queue with "connect to 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]: Connection
refused".
What is the best way to get postfix to try connecting to amavis again
after amavis has been restarted?
Thanks,
Stuar
accepted are valid email addresses. Is this no longer considered a best
practice?
I'm just curious to hear opinions -- thanks,
Stuart Johnston
Here is an interesting thread (that Bojan was involved with) that
glowingly illustrates good reason to immediately reject mail to unknown
addresses. Is this no longer considered a best
practice?
I'm just curious to hear opinions -- thanks,
Stuart Johnston
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roa
Ed Walker wrote:
Instead of storing the client_addr as a VARCHAR(255), how about storing
it instead as a 32bit number in a column of type UNISIGNED INT?
This'll reduce storage and speed queries.
MySQL can convert back and forth using inet_aton and inet_ntoa.
Perhaps there's something sim
18 matches
Mail list logo
