Gary V schrieb:
> Marius wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> on a P4, it takes about 2 Minutes to restart clamd while amavis is
>> running and falling back to clamscan.
>> Maybe the double access to the signature file waste alot of time.
>
>> Marius.
>
>> Tue Jun 5 19:46:04 2007 -> +++ Started at Tue Jun 5
Marius wrote:
> Hello,
> on a P4, it takes about 2 Minutes to restart clamd while amavis is
> running and falling back to clamscan.
> Maybe the double access to the signature file waste alot of time.
> Marius.
> Tue Jun 5 19:46:04 2007 -> +++ Started at Tue Jun 5 19:46:04 2007
> Tue Jun 5 19:
Hello,
on a P4, it takes about 2 Minutes to restart clamd while amavis is
running and falling back to clamscan.
Maybe the double access to the signature file waste alot of time.
Marius.
Tue Jun 5 19:46:04 2007 -> +++ Started at Tue Jun 5 19:46:04 2007
Tue Jun 5 19:46:04 2007 -> clamd daemon 0.
Peter wrote:
> Thanks you for all your comments, at least I know now, I haven't gone
> compeletly gaga.
> I don't know, in fact I don't think it has anything to do with reading the
> signature files. I had the log open, when it said
> Tue Jun 5 09:07:09 2007 -> Reading databases from /var/c
Thanks you for all your comments, at least I know now, I haven't gone
compeletly gaga.
I don't know, in fact I don't think it has anything to do with reading the
signature files. I had the log open, when it said
Tue Jun 5 09:07:09 2007 -> Reading databases from /var/clamav
Tue Jun 5 09:07:
Michael wrote:
>>
>> Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 09:34 +0200 schrieb Peter
>> Huetmannsberger:
>>
>> yes, the same here on debian etch. Seems clamd now needs very
>> long time to read the signature database.
>>
> Same on Freebsd, 5.5
Hmm. I also run etch on P4 2.0:
Tue Jun 5 09:46:37 2007
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Marius Sturm
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 4:49 AM
> To: Amavis ML
> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Clamd-90.3 acting strangely
>
>
> Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 09:34 +0200 schrieb Peter Huetmannsberger:
yes, the same here on debian etch. Seems clamd now needs very long time
to read the signature database.
marius.
> I have updated clamd on all my machines, mostly running RH9 to RHEL4 and
> CentOS4, and after the update clam
Hi,
just wondering,
I have updated clamd on all my machines, mostly running RH9 to RHEL4 and
CentOS4, and after the update clamd does not create the socket
immediately. It seems to take up to three minutes, before it decides to
create a socket, at whatever the location. After that it is fin