Re: [AMaViS-user] Filtering before banned attachments

Robert, On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 01:53 +0100, mouss wrote: Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: I see a message get sent through and labeled 'WARNING: contains banned part' like it should according to our banned policies as it scores zero in SA. I am assuming zero means that SA didn't even scan the

Re: [AMaViS-user] Filtering before banned attachments

On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 01:53 +0100, mouss wrote: Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: I see a message get sent through and labeled 'WARNING: contains banned part' like it should according to our banned policies as it scores zero in SA. I am assuming zero means that SA didn't even scan the content? If

Re: [AMaViS-user] Filtering before banned attachments

Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: I see a message get sent through and labeled 'WARNING: contains banned part' like it should according to our banned policies as it scores zero in SA. I am assuming zero means that SA didn't even scan the content? If I take the source of the message without the

[AMaViS-user] Filtering before banned attachments

I see a message get sent through and labeled 'WARNING: contains banned part' like it should according to our banned policies as it scores zero in SA. I am assuming zero means that SA didn't even scan the content? If I take the source of the message without the attachment, it scores plenty high