Re: [AMaViS-user] Meaning?

2005-08-02 Thread Mark Martinec
> Which would mean that either you have a hash collision, would would be > very unprobable, or the first mail that got hashed and cached came > from a whitelisted sender. Whitelisting should have no effect there, it does not propagate through cache, white/blacklisting is always re-checked on per-r

RE: [AMaViS-user] Meaning?

2005-08-02 Thread Sven Riedel
Hi, > We get this (or something like it) in the maillog on a regular basis: > > Jul 30 06:35:28 spamhost amavis[1516]: (01516-18) cached > fa63a14bcc69e31f69e554579f645969 from > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (1,0,1) amavis can keep a cache hashes of mails with the corresponding diagnosis (virus/clean/spa

[AMaViS-user] Meaning?

2005-08-02 Thread Dustin Humm
We have a Postfix(2.1.5)/Amavis-new(20030616)/SpamAssassin(3.0.2) setup on RH9. Our setup works very well with one exception: We get this (or something like it) in the maillog on a regular basis: Jul 30 06:35:28 spamhost amavis[1516]: (01516-18) cached fa63a14bcc69e31f69e554579f645969 from <[EMA