On Fri, November 3, 2006 18:27, Jakob Curdes wrote:
>>> We do not use AWL; this has proven to be dangerous.
>> how ?
>> did "auto_whitelist_factor" not help ?
>> the reason i use it is that it caches first time senders nicely, with imho
>> is mostly spam senders anyway :-)
> I would not agree to
Benny Pedersen schrieb:
>On Fri, November 3, 2006 07:28, Jakob Curdes wrote:
>
>
>
>>We do not use AWL; this has proven to be dangerous.
>>
>>
>
>how ?
>
>did "auto_whitelist_factor" not help ?
>
>
>
>the reason i use it is that it caches first time senders nicely, with imho is
>mostly sp
On Fri, November 3, 2006 07:28, Jakob Curdes wrote:
> We do not use AWL; this has proven to be dangerous.
how ?
did "auto_whitelist_factor" not help ?
the reason i use it is that it caches first time senders nicely, with imho is
mostly spam senders anyway :-)
> We use dspam and Bayes in para
>> I beg to differ with you. On the contrary, there have been a number
>>of recent posts to the SA list from admins all of whose spam is now
>>identified as BAYES_00 and AWL, because they enabled autolearn and let
>>it run on its own while a lot of spam was slipping through.
>>
>>
>
>This wa
> Greylisting is a doubled edged sword, although beneficial in defering
> illegitimate messages it also breaks misconfigured mail servers and the
> users scream bloody murder when they dont get email at the speed of IM.
> Sad to say this is my case here. We did however have it turned on
> (SQ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/02/2006 02:48:03 PM:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 03:38:11PM +0100, Jakob Curdes wrote:
> > Do you use Bayes in spamassassin ? Without a self-adapting filter such
> > as bayes or dspam a lot of stuff will slip through nowadays.You can
tell
> > SA to train bayes from
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 03:38:11PM +0100, Jakob Curdes wrote:
> Do you use Bayes in spamassassin ? Without a self-adapting filter such
> as bayes or dspam a lot of stuff will slip through nowadays.You can tell
> SA to train bayes from the rule-based score. Then you get a quite good
> database wi
-- Jakob Curdes said the following on 11/2/06 8:38 AM:
> Do you use Bayes in spamassassin ? Without a self-adapting filter such
> as bayes or dspam a lot of stuff will slip through nowadays.
So, roughly speaking, how do folks think DSPAM compares to Bayes within
SpamAssassin?
Amos
-
Do you use Bayes in spamassassin ? Without a self-adapting filter such
as bayes or dspam a lot of stuff will slip through nowadays.You can tell
SA to train bayes from the rule-based score. Then you get a quite good
database without much manual traiing. Every spam case with slightly
varying text
Lately we seem to have a pretty good handle on all spam threats except for
the same old stock tip emails. The format of the email is:
1. Ramdom subject, but usually with "you have to read." somewhere in there
(not always though).
2. Talks about the stock, great volume, projected increase, per q
10 matches
Mail list logo