Re: [AMaViS-user] Trouble with executable files

2005-09-30 Thread Lima Union
On 9/29/05, Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > JC, > > > I posted this to the SA ML and they suggested me to post here, so: > > It is most likely that the 'Checksum error' part is genuine and the > 'Inappropriate ioctl for device' part of the message is bogus. > > For all executables the su

Re: [AMaViS-user] Trouble with executable files

2005-09-29 Thread Mark Martinec
JC, > I posted this to the SA ML and they suggested me to post here, so: > > I'm currently testing RHEL4 + SA 3.0.4 + amavisd-new > (2.3.2-1.2.el4.rf) + Postgrey + Postfix (2.2.5-3.rhel4). > > While running amavisd in 'sa-debug' mode, whenever I send a mail with > a binary file I receive the follo

[AMaViS-user] Trouble with executable files

2005-09-26 Thread Lima Union
Hi! I posted this to the SA ML and they suggested me to post here, so: I'm currently testing RHEL4 + SA 3.0.4 + amavisd-new (2.3.2-1.2.el4.rf) + Postgrey + Postfix (2.2.5-3.rhel4). While running amavisd in 'sa-debug' mode, whenever I send a mail with a binary file I receive the following message