Would it make sense to move the virus checks to another machine ?
Gmax
> Trey,
>
>> I am not opposed to multiple amavisd-new servers, but I'm not sure how
>> that would be implemented with our setup. The messages are all
>> delivered to one server, so how do you propose that we distribute the
>>
Trey,
> I am not opposed to multiple amavisd-new servers, but I'm not sure how
> that would be implemented with our setup. The messages are all
> delivered to one server, so how do you propose that we distribute the
> email among multiple servers? We cannot just do it on a per-domain
> basis, be
> I am not opposed to multiple amavisd-new servers, but I'm not sure how
> that would be implemented with our setup. The messages are all
> delivered to one server, so how do you propose that we distribute the
> email among multiple servers? We cannot just do it on a per-domain
> basis, because
Stuart Johnston wrote:
> Trey Nolen wrote:
>> On 12/8/06, Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Trey Nolen wrote:
We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
starting to run into performance
Trey Nolen wrote:
> On 12/8/06, Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Trey Nolen wrote:
>>> We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
>>> tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
>>> starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. W
On 12/8/06, Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trey Nolen wrote:
> > We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
> > tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
> > starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are
> > looking at
Trey Nolen wrote:
> We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
> tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
> starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are
> looking at amavisd-new as a replacement, but we have an issue with the
> spa
We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are
looking at amavisd-new as a replacement, but we have an issue with the
spam implementation. Right now
