boricua wrote:
any reason for not discarding bad header.
I do that. It's better than Postfix's 8-bit header fix. If header fields
are unreadable, with my MTA and MUAs, I don't want them on my (European)
site.
today is 95% of the spam i get
About 2% (sucking a wet finger, here).
X-Amav
boricua,
> any reason for not discarding bad header.
> today is 95% of the spam i get
>
> X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER Improper folded header field made up entirely of
> whitespace in message header 'X-Spam-Report': \t
Sure, in most cases mail with such headers can be discarded.
> any good reason
any reason for not discarding bad header.
today is 95% of the spam i get
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER Improper folded header field made up entirely of
whitespace in message header 'X-Spam-Report': \t
any good reason why this is not a default?
-
