Re: [AMaViS-user] ot: date issue with sa

2010-02-11 Thread Francois Rolland
G. Miliotis wrote: Voytek Eymont wrote: On Thu, February 11, 2010 8:33 am, Noel Jones wrote: On 2/10/2010 3:06 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote: Wild guess is the new SA version installed to a different location, and amavisd is still using the old version of SA. Locate your SA

[AMaViS-user] ot: date issue with sa

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
several of my users had recently quite a few 'inter-office' emails wrongly diverted to 'spam user' mailbox: us...@thisdom us...@thisdom 'thisdom' is hosted on the server, but, the users are remote to the server, mail sent via several diferent isps I've looked at the spam headers, quite a few had

Re: [AMaViS-user] ot: date issue with sa

2010-02-10 Thread Noel Jones
On 2/10/2010 3:06 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote: several of my users had recently quite a few 'inter-office' emails wrongly diverted to 'spam user' mailbox: us...@thisdom us...@thisdom 'thisdom' is hosted on the server, but, the users are remote to the server, mail sent via several diferent isps

Re: [AMaViS-user] ot: date issue with sa

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Thu, February 11, 2010 8:33 am, Noel Jones wrote: On 2/10/2010 3:06 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote: add to your spamassassin/local.cf score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0 Wild guess is the new SA version installed to a different location, and amavisd is still using the old version of SA. Noel, thanks,

Re: [AMaViS-user] ot: date issue with sa

2010-02-10 Thread G. Miliotis
Voytek Eymont wrote: On Thu, February 11, 2010 8:33 am, Noel Jones wrote: On 2/10/2010 3:06 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote: add to your spamassassin/local.cf score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0 Wild guess is the new SA version installed to a different location, and amavisd is still using the