Re: amavis whitelist rescipient address match

2011-05-30 Thread Luigi Rosa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gary V said the following on 30/05/11 23:44: > On 5/30/11, Mark Martinec wrote: Thank you both. Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ Avoid strange women and temporary variables. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

Re: amavisd-new chokes on all tar files?

2011-05-30 Thread John Clements
On May 30, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: > John, > >> My current amavisd-new installation is buggy with respect to tar files. >> Specifically, I sent myself a test message with a VERY SMALL tar file, of >> 92 bytes (which tars into 2048 bytes). It's so small, in fact, that I can >> qu

Re: amavis whitelist rescipient address match

2011-05-30 Thread Gary V
On 5/30/11, Mark Martinec wrote: >> What address does amavis use for whitelisting? To field or envelope? > > Both since 2.6.0. Before that only the envelope sender address was used. > > > amavisd-new-2.6.0 release notes: > > - white and blacklisting now takes into account both the SMTP envelope >

Re: amavis whitelist rescipient address match

2011-05-30 Thread Mark Martinec
> What address does amavis use for whitelisting? To field or envelope? Both since 2.6.0. Before that only the envelope sender address was used. amavisd-new-2.6.0 release notes: - white and blacklisting now takes into account both the SMTP envelope sender address, as well as the author addres

Re: stale sessions

2011-05-30 Thread Mark Martinec
Timo, > a few days ago we migrated our old Amavis Servers to new ones. I was > monitoring the logs if everything works fine. > > The new servers are almost the same, just a new operating system (old: > SLES10SP2(physical machine) new:SLES11SP1(virtual machine)) with new > packages (old: amavisd-n

Re: amavisd-new chokes on all tar files?

2011-05-30 Thread Mark Martinec
John, > My current amavisd-new installation is buggy with respect to tar files. > Specifically, I sent myself a test message with a VERY SMALL tar file, of > 92 bytes (which tars into 2048 bytes). It's so small, in fact, that I can > quote the whole thing below (and I've done so, just so you can

Re: LDAP not connecting over IPv6

2011-05-30 Thread Christian Roessner
Am 30.05.2011 18:41, schrieb Mark Martinec: > Christian, Quanah, > >> latest amavis-pre: LDAP ist not connected over IPv6: >> The postgresql database is connected over IPv6, but not LDAP. > > Please try the attached patch (against 2.7.0-rc1). Works for me :-) Thx Christian

Re: Notify Sender when a virus is detected

2011-05-30 Thread Mark Martinec
Damien, > Hi Michael, > Sorry for disturb you again, but since your reply I've search in the > mailing archiv, but I can't find the topic or more topics who the > instructions where posted. > Have you the link ? http://marc.info/?l=amavis-user&m=130167325421835 Mark

Re: LDAP not connecting over IPv6

2011-05-30 Thread Mark Martinec
Christian, Quanah, > latest amavis-pre: LDAP ist not connected over IPv6: > The postgresql database is connected over IPv6, but not LDAP. Please try the attached patch (against 2.7.0-rc1). Mark --- amavisd~ 2011-05-19 02:33:27.0 +0200 +++ amavisd 2011-05-30 18:34:54.0 +0200 @@

Re: email with Passed SPAM

2011-05-30 Thread Oberdan Albertoni
Spam to these two recipients were passed on to Postfix: To these recipients it was blocked. Are you using per-recipient settings of any kind (LDAP, SQL, hash lookup, etc)? If so, what is different between owner-digicolor-l...@digicolor.net and safe...@dns.digicolor.net (for example). It

Re: email with Passed SPAM

2011-05-30 Thread Oberdan Albertoni
Il 27/05/2011 17:59, Bailey, Damian S. ha scritto: Oberdan, I'm new to responding to issues with amavis, but here's something I'd check. You have the kill level set which is great, but what's happening to your email that's above the threshold? Right now it's being passed. I would check you