Am 08.05.2018 um 23:53 schrieb Philip:
> I'm having some problems moving messages marked as spam to the IMAP spam
> folder. I'm aware that amavis-new will run spamassassin and clamav then
> pass it back to postfix for delivery but currently it's being
> DISCARDED. Messages that don't contain a
Am 03.05.2018 um 19:32 schrieb R M Crorie:
> Version in use is 2.8.1-11.1-x86_64... thanks.
Which distribution is this, Debian with its ancient packages?
Zitat von Alex :
We all have clamav+sanesecurity, but what others are people using?
Sophos is horrible. Hardly worth it. It doesn't scan for nearly any of
the popular vectors now.
The truth is that all virus scanners do suck equally at preventing the
spread of new
Am 2016-11-28 14:14, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
I consider amavis orphaned. It is fully functional and if there are
known
security issues the author, Mark Martinec, fixes them. He releases a
new
version of amavis about each year. Submitted patches may end up
upstream in
the release. But
Am 24.11.2016 um 22:04 schrieb Alexander Masidlover:
Thanks, I had been wondering about moving to SQL storage as we get a reasonably
large volume of email through; however, I’m a bit concerned about doing all the
set-up and still getting the same result!
One serious advise: don't.
Zitat von Dave McGuire mcgu...@neurotica.com:
Along these lines, where are people getting good SA rules these days?
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets
Am 29.11.2014 um 21:52 schrieb David Mehler:
Where do I get additional rules? I've looked but where I am looking
appears defunct the sites that is.
Take for starters a look at:
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets
It has enough active sets so far.
Am 26.11.2014 um 07:56 schrieb Jernej Porenta:
If you want to go further, you will need to add some not-really fc20
features:
- add crm114/dspam learning to amavis/spamassassin
I am for myself running Amavisd with Spamassassin and CRM114. I tried
Dspam, but CRM114 lead to way more better
Zitat von David Mehler dave.meh...@gmail.com:
Does anyone have this combination working? I've got the postfix server
going and the amavis is integrated, it's tagging spam, but it's not
tagging high enough to mark. I'm wondering if my configuration is
wrong or incomplete? I've used fc20 rpm
Hello out there!
Currently I am tuning my local amavisd-new installation (v. 2.7.2) in
conjunction with Postfix on a modest Gentoo box.
My aim is that amavisd-new should honor the sauserprefs of local users
as much as possible.
All users which have local user prefs for Spamassassin are
10 matches
Mail list logo