t uses the same protocol
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
--
os and savi. So for us is
just a matter of installing the rpms, register the sophos and changing the
amavisd.conf.
>From sophos the only file that we require is sav-linux-9-i386.tgz (don't know
why it is named i386).
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
ustom policy bank with the bad_header
disabled:
$policy_bank{'NOBADH'} = {
bypass_header_checks_maps => [1], # don't header-check this mail
};
Then using a custom plugin the only thing is check the subject and if it
matches load the policy:
Please check http://sourceforge.net/p/amavis/mailman/message/22650183/
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
t; [%O|,]#
[? %q ||, quarantine: %q]#
[? %Q ||, Queue-ID: %Q]#
[? %m ||, Message-ID: %m]#
[? %r ||, Resent-Message-ID: %r]#
, mail_id: %i#
, Hits: [:SCORE]#
, size: %z#
[? %#T ||, Tests: \[[%T|,]\]]#
, %y ms#
]
EOD
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
2.2.1). (See
> http://www.maiamailguard.com/maia/wiki/AmavisVersion for more details.)
>
> Rich Wales
> ri...@richw.org
That was one of the reasons we developed our own. That and the fact that we
would need to buy licenses because we provided a service on top of that.
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
On Wednesday 07 August 2013 13:24:15 Dave McGuire wrote:
> On 08/07/2013 01:09 PM, Nuno Fernandes wrote:
> > I've created our own web frontend to amavis to provide some of our
> > customers the spam filtering service.
> >
> > It's web services based a
eeds and change some of amavis
(mostly because our ORM requires primary keys).
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
On Wednesday 07 August 2013 16:51:41 Benedict White wrote:
> I'm just wondering, as most of the web front ends seem to be orphaned in one
> way or another which is a shame. I won
mavisd, then start
> amavisd-snmp?
>
> Thanks
>
> Levi
>
I also have the problem. Mitigated in cacti templates by defining plausible
limits.
Nuno Fernandes
On Wednesday 25 July 2012 16:59:58 Nuno Fernandes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In my setup, users get the email with the X-Spam-Status header:
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5
> tests=[AWL=-0.258, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
&g
/shm we also had to comment in the section "scanner":
#deny: /dev
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
On Wednesday 01 August 2012 14:14:46 Mark Martinec wrote:
> Nuno,
>
> > It was reported by Miguel here. Please check email with subject: "Sophos
> > - savid: Clien
ary/001193.html
We will need to do more tests to see if anything changed.
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
nce version 2.7.0.
>
> Mark
Hello,
We had some issues related to SSSP protocol and remained in sophie. It's
proven and solid...
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
m-Status', sub {
open (FH, "> /tmp/log");
print FH Dumper(\@_);
close FH;
});
}
};
1; # insure a defined return
The file /tmp/log isn't created at all. Anyone knows where the problem
is? Is there a better way of doing that?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
Hello,
Did you have the time to create the scripts and templates?
Best regards,
Nuno Fernandes
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 08:52:17 Andrea gabellini - SC wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I'm writing some scripts and templates. When I'll ready I'll post my
> work on the list.
>
is a possibility of
that..
Does anyone have any cacti amavis template that can be used?
Thanks,
Nuno Fernandes
On Monday 18 April 2011, david touzeau wrote:
> Le lundi 18 avril 2011 à 17:32 +0100, Nuno Fernandes a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a amavisd-new-2.6.4 installed and somewhat this weekend, it
> > started to take long time to process emails (drom 2/3 sec
%)100, update_snmp: 2 (0%)100, SMTP pre-response: 1 (0%)100, SMTP
response: 1 (0%)100,
How can i increase the loglevel so that i can see what is taking that long?
Thanks,
Nuno Fernandes
17 matches
Mail list logo
