Re: Received trace question

2017-02-02 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
On 2017-02-02 23:01, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Per olof Ljungmark skrev den 2017-02-02 22:37: > >> So what am I missing? This is clearly not "spam from laocal". > > x-forward > > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PostfixAmavisNew > > good example c

Received trace question

2017-02-02 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Hi, It was a while since I did this so I need to refresh my memory a little. In the following amavisd says 192.168.64.1 is the *first* upsstream client and the message gets flagged as "spam from local". -- First upstream SMTP client IP address: [192.168.64.1]:16601 nh1.nethead.se Received

Re: spam_kill_level_maps

2016-04-27 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
On 2016-04-27 01:28, Mark Martinec wrote: >>> The hash-type lookup does not support delayed dereferencing. >>> You should use one of the following two variants: >>> >>> @spam_kill_level_maps = ( >>> { >>> 'adre...@example.com' => 4.0, >>> 'adre...@example.com' => 4.0, >>>

Re: spam_kill_level_maps

2016-04-26 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
On 2016-04-26 19:52, Mark Martinec wrote: > On 2016-04-26 00:28, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >> We would like to have a different kill level for a couple of users, not >> sure how to do that properly. >> >> Tried >> >> $sa_kill_level_deflt

spam_kill_level_maps

2016-04-25 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
We would like to have a different kill level for a couple of users, not sure how to do that properly. Tried $sa_kill_level_deflt = 5.2; # triggers spam evasive actions @spam_kill_level_maps = ( { 'adre...@example.com' => 4.0, 'adre...@example.com' => 4.0, 'adre...@example.com'