Klaus,
> thank you for your information, but we do not use alterMIME or any
> similar programm to change something. From our yesterdays Test, this
> is the message source of the e-Mail, please can you see something,
> where the problem can occur?
>
> Received: from mx11.ourdomain.tld (mx11.ourdom
Hallo Mark,
thank you for your information, but we do not use alterMIME or any
similar programm to change something. From our yesterdays Test, this
is the message source of the e-Mail, please can you see something,
where the problem can occur?
message source start
Return-Path:
Am 20.03.2012 14:59 schrieb Klaus Tachtler:
> Any ideas?
You could use @debug_recipient_maps / @debug_sender_maps
to trace the difference when $bypass_decode_part is on or off.
--
Andreas Schulze
Internetdienste | P252
DATEV eG
90329 Nürnberg | Telefon +49 911 319-0 | Telefax +49 911 319-3196
E
Klaus,
> so, we wonder a little bit, because when we set
>
>$bypass_decode_parts = 1;
>
> the we can GET the e-mail WITH attachment. If we doesn't set
> $bypass_decode_parts, the we GET the e-mail WITHOUT the attachment.
>
> The $bypass_decode_parts = 1; in conjunction with set
>
Hello Michael,
hello List,
so, we wonder a little bit, because when we set
$bypass_decode_parts = 1;
the we can GET the e-mail WITH attachment. If we doesn't set
$bypass_decode_parts, the we GET the e-mail WITHOUT the attachment.
The $bypass_decode_parts = 1; in conjunction with set
On 3/20/12 3:10 AM, Klaus Tachtler wrote:
Hello List,
we dont want to have exe send via e-mail, but sometimes it is
necassary to get some on a special e-Mail address. BUT when configured
@banned-files_lovers_maps with this special address
(specialu...@ourdomain.tld), the e-Mail was deliverd,
Hello List,
we dont want to have exe send via e-mail, but sometimes it is
necassary to get some on a special e-Mail address. BUT when configured
@banned-files_lovers_maps with this special address
(specialu...@ourdomain.tld), the e-Mail was deliverd, BUT the
attachment was NOT? But in thi
