Re: Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-10 Thread Benny Pedersen
set mynetworks in amavisd, equal to internal_networks in spamassassin

Re: Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-10 Thread Michael H
On 10/03/16 11:59, Michael H wrote: > On 10/03/16 11:02, Michael H wrote: >> On 10/03/16 10:43, Michael H wrote: >>> On 10/03/16 03:53, Tom Johnson wrote: On Mar 9, 2016, at 7:11 PM, Indunil Jayasooriya > wrote: > >

Re: Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-10 Thread Michael H
On 10/03/16 11:02, Michael H wrote: > On 10/03/16 10:43, Michael H wrote: >> On 10/03/16 03:53, Tom Johnson wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mar 9, 2016, at 7:11 PM, Indunil Jayasooriya >> > wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Tom

Re: Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-10 Thread Michael H
On 10/03/16 10:43, Michael H wrote: > On 10/03/16 03:53, Tom Johnson wrote: >> >> >> On Mar 9, 2016, at 7:11 PM, Indunil Jayasooriya > > wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Tom Johnson >>

Re: Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-10 Thread Michael H
On 10/03/16 03:53, Tom Johnson wrote: > > > On Mar 9, 2016, at 7:11 PM, Indunil Jayasooriya > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Tom Johnson > > wrote: >> >> I'm sorry if I

Re: Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-09 Thread Tom Johnson
> On Mar 9, 2016, at 7:11 PM, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Tom Johnson wrote: >> I'm sorry if I wasn't clear - adding to trusted_networks is not an option. >> Different users have different needs. One person

Re: Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-09 Thread Indunil Jayasooriya
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Tom Johnson wrote: > I'm sorry if I wasn't clear - adding to trusted_networks is not an > option. Different users have different needs. One person might want > x.x.x.x whitelisted, but another may not. > Why don't you need to whitelist

Re: Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-09 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 09.03.2016 um 20:27 schrieb Tom Johnson: > I'm sorry if I wasn't clear - adding to trusted_networks is not an > option. Different users have different needs. One person might want > x.x.x.x whitelisted, but another may not. perhaps you like http://wiki.policyd.org/policies

Re: Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-09 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 9. mar. 2016 20.15.41 "J. Echter" wrote: So foo-user trusted_networks 8.8.8.8 in sql user prefs, untested Note whitelist_from is a joke i'd also go for trusted_networks in local.cf of spamassassin. Is greylisting also a problem? Yes trusted must be

Re: Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-09 Thread J. Echter
Am 09.03.2016 um 18:11 schrieb Benny Pedersen: > So foo-user trusted_networks 8.8.8.8 in sql user prefs, untested > > Note whitelist_from is a joke i'd also go for trusted_networks in local.cf of spamassassin. Is greylisting also a problem?

Re: Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-09 Thread Benny Pedersen
So foo-user trusted_networks 8.8.8.8 in sql user prefs, untested Note whitelist_from is a joke

Re: Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-09 Thread Robert Schetterer
th it. > > The ideal would be to have it work with the standard wblist feature (we use > sql). > > Are there any plans to add whitelisting by IP address to the regular wblist > feature? Or is this something we're going to have add on our own via a > custom hook? >

Whitelisting by IP address

2016-03-09 Thread Tom Johnson
). Are there any plans to add whitelisting by IP address to the regular wblist feature? Or is this something we're going to have add on our own via a custom hook? Thanks- Tom