Hello!
I don't think that `void foo() -> null` should be supported. Like in
lambdas if the method returns void, only expressions which can be used as
expression statement should be allowed. I don't think that special support
for empty bodies is necessary as {} is short enough. Especially if your
Testing the prototype, i've seen myself using -> null instead of a classical
empty method body when i want to have a method that does nothing.
class A {
void f() -> null;
// versus
void f() {
}
}
the compiler translates the concise version to aconst_null pop return instead
of a plain
Hi all,
i've played a little bit with the concise method prototype.
i think that using '=' to 'assign' a method reference to a method signature
- is visually too close to a field assignment.
- send the wrong message because there is no assignment at runtime.
A way to avoid the issue listed above
