> De: "Brian Goetz"
> À: "Remi Forax" , "Gavin Bierman"
>
> Cc: "amber-spec-experts"
> Envoyé: Lundi 22 Mars 2021 15:12:58
> Objet: Re: Draft JEP: Sealed Classes
>> I think it's missing a discussion about lambdas, anonymous
I think it's missing a discussion about lambdas, anonymous classes and
local classes that can all extends/implements a sealed type.
For Lambdas and anonymous classes, it's easy, they are anonymous, so
have no name to list in the permits clause.
Yes, we should state these exclusions explicit
> De: "Gavin Bierman"
> À: "amber-spec-experts"
> Envoyé: Lundi 22 Mars 2021 13:03:31
> Objet: Draft JEP: Sealed Classes
> Dear all,
> Now JDK 16 is out (yay!) it’s time for us to focus on finalizing Sealed
> Classes
> in JDK 17.
> I have writ
Dear all,
Now JDK 16 is out (yay!) it’s time for us to focus on finalizing Sealed Classes
in JDK 17.
I have written a draft JEP, which is unchanged (other than some superficial
editorial changes) from JEP 397.
https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/8260514
(I think Brian’s proposal to consider extendi
