Re: Record Component attributes

2019-10-10 Thread Maurizio Cimadamore
On 09/10/2019 19:34, Remi Forax wrote: - Mail original - De: "Remi Forax" À: "Brian Goetz" Cc: "amber-spec-experts" Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Octobre 2019 18:44:23 Objet: Re: Record Component attributes - Mail original - De: "Brian Goetz"

Re: Record Component attributes

2019-10-09 Thread Remi Forax
- Mail original - > De: "Remi Forax" > À: "Brian Goetz" > Cc: "amber-spec-experts" > Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Octobre 2019 18:44:23 > Objet: Re: Record Component attributes > - Mail original - >> De: "Brian Goetz" &

Re: Record Component attributes

2019-10-09 Thread forax
- Mail original - > De: "Brian Goetz" > À: "Remi Forax" , "amber-spec-experts" > > Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Octobre 2019 17:59:56 > Objet: Re: Record Component attributes >> just to be sure, do we agree that a record component can be depre

Re: Record Component attributes

2019-10-09 Thread Brian Goetz
just to be sure, do we agree that a record component can be deprecated, synthetic, have a generic signature, have unknown attributes, have annotation and type annotations ? Deprecated: not clear what this would mean, since removing a component is not a BC or SC change, and therefore remova

Record Component attributes

2019-10-09 Thread Remi Forax
Hi all, just to be sure, do we agree that a record component can be deprecated, synthetic, have a generic signature, have unknown attributes, have annotation and type annotations ? so the attributes with a special meaning are SIGNATURE, DEPRECATED, SYNTHETIC, RUNTIME_VISIBLE_ANNOTATIONS, RUNT